The Bus Stop Farce

[Bill Chapman]

I haven’t seen that before, Bill. Where does Robert say that, if you know?

In the link I provided.

[Charles Collins]

In the link I provided.

Wow, how did I miss seeing the link?

Okay, so this is what the author says Robert told him. And he said that Lee brought them home. So it appears to me that this must have been when Robert and Lee both lived with their mother. Long before the assassination.

Still, I don’t remember reading about this in Robert’s book. That’s why I am surprised. Robert believes LHO is guilty. So he wouldn’t have reason to not say something about it in the book.

Oh well, it just goes to show that LHO was interested in guns at an early age. So was I.

[Martin Weidmann]

No paper work ever produced that he bought it in Fort Worth i'm guessing?

Was it ever investigated? I doubt it... they had their man, right?

The naysayers claim that there is no evidence that LHO lied. They also believe him when he said that he didn’t shoot anybody. Go figure...

The naysayers claim that there is no evidence that LHO lied

How do you prove LHO lied about buying his revolver in Fort Worth when you don't investigate?

They also believe him when he said that he didn’t shoot anybody.

Who are "they"? Unlike you I would like to see actual evidence to prove something like this one way or the other.

If you want to believe, go to church!

[Bill Chapman]

Wow, how did I miss seeing the link?

Okay, so this is what the author says Robert told him. And he said that Lee brought them home. So it appears to me that this must have been when Robert and Lee both lived with their mother. Long before the assassination.

Still, I don’t remember reading about this in Robert’s book. That’s why I am surprised. Robert believes LHO is guilty. So he wouldn’t have reason to not say something about it in the book.

Oh well, it just goes to show that LHO was interested in guns at an early age. So was I.

It's what boys do

[Bill Chapman]

The naysayers claim that there is no evidence that LHO lied. They also believe him when he said that he didn’t shoot anybody. Go figure...

-------------------------
THE CULT OF OSWALD
-------------------------
Nothing is Knowable
Nothing is Provable
Nothing is Believable

[Martin Weidmann]

-------------------------
THE CULT OF OSWALD
-------------------------
Nothing is Knowable
Nothing is Provable
Nothing is Believable

The LN matra: Who cares about the problems with the evidence, let's just make assumptions to fill the gaps and declare him guilty

[Bill Chapman]

A typical irrelevant reply from somebody who lacks the ability to argue his own case and makes do with pathetic one liners

Jumping to conclusions based on assumptions is your "reality", not mine.

Your world;

One witness said Oswald left the rooming house wearing a dark colored jacket, so the white jacket found under a parked car must be that jacket.... and oh btw it's actually grey...

Oswald carried a revolver when he was arrested. He admits it to Fritz and says he bought it in Forth Worth, so the revolver that shows up at the police station two hours after his arrest must be that revolver..... and oh btw it's actually bought by a mail order.

Oh, btw I don't claim that Oswald got the gun in Fort Worth. I only reported that he claimed that he did—and didn't say where in Fort Worth he got it. And aren't you going against form by agreeing that the gun was bought by mail-order? I haven't seen one CT agree to that.

You claim that Earlene was 'half blind' and had her back to Oswald. So all of a sudden her eyesight is perfect and her memory infallible. Wow.

No need to jump to conclusions given that witnesses saw Oswald in a jacket @Tippit and have their individual memories of the colour of the jacket, whether in harsh sunlight or in the shadows. You do realize that ambient light can influence the colour objects.... right?