The Bus Stop Farce

[Charles Collins]

The WC wasn't tasked to prove anything
They said 'probably'
The HSCA said 'likely'

The quote from Myers is part of his answer to a FAQ regarding his animation: Why should I believe your conclusions? If you want to read more, it can be found on his website, jfkfiles.com.

[Bill Chapman]

Nope... the boarding house was a destination that made sense. 10th street no so much, or rather not at all

How often in your life did you run to a place where you had no apparent business being, where nothing was happening, where there was nowhere to go and where there was nobody you knew to meet?

'the boarding house was a destination that made sense'
>>> It sure did

'no apparent business being, where nothing was happening'
>>> Life can turn on a dime

[Bill Chapman]

The quote from Myers is part of his answer to a FAQ regarding his animation: Why should I believe your conclusions? If you want to read more, it can be found on his website, jfkfiles.com.

I think that your post is meant for Martin
I'm not engaging in the Myers discussion at this point

[Jerry Freeman]

Mr. BALL. Was he dressed the same in the lineup as he was when you saw him running across the lawn?
Mrs. DAVIS. All except he didn't have a black coat on when I saw him in the lineup.
Mr. BALL. Did he have a coat on when you saw him?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. What color coat?
Mrs. DAVIS. A dark coat.
Mr. BALL. Now, did you recognize him from his face or from his clothes when you saw him in the lineup?
Mrs. DAVIS. Well, I looked at his clothes and then his face from the side because I had seen him from a side view of him. I didn't see him fullface.

A dark coat.

[Charles Collins]

I think that your post is meant for Martin
I'm not engaging in the Myers discussion at this point

Actually, the quote you responded to (in that post) was Martin’s response to the Myers quote. Therefore, I thought that was what was being discussed. But logic never works when Martin is involved.....

[Martin Weidmann]

Actually, the quote you responded to (in that post) was Martin’s response to the Myers quote. Therefore, I thought that was what was being discussed. But logic never works when Martin is involved.....

So you reply to a reply to my post (instead of directly to my post) and call that "logic".... Wow!

No wonder your "logic" never works when I'm involved. 

[Charles Collins]

So you reply to a reply to my post (instead of directly to my post) and call that "logic".... Wow!

No wonder your "logic" never works when I'm involved. 

I was replying to Bill’s remark. Not to you.

[Martin Weidmann]

I was replying to Bill’s remark. Not to you.

Making sense isn't always a quality you are known for either