Some people refuse to accept that the real killers escaped and we honestly don't know who killed our president. It certainly wasn't Oswald unless his powers of bilocation were fully active that day. Moreover, the Zapruder film, Dealey Plaza eyewitnesses, Parkland reports, and autospy witnesses clearly state the fatal shot originated from the front, resulting in a massive hole in the BACK of the head. It's possible there were two head shots, but why didn't the president's face show damage if Oswald is the killer? We also know the SBT is anatomically impossible since multiple witnesses at the autopsy reported that the BACK SHOT DID NOT EXIT. The wound penetrated to a depth of less than a finger's length! END OF SINGLE BULLET THEORY FOREVER. Let's be honest about the SBT, shall we? It's was a moronic idea from the start and Arlen Specter should be inducted in the historical Hall of Shame for concocting it. The wound in the president's throat was an entrance as stated by experienced doctors and nurses in Dallas. May the history books exonerate Oswald, who was most likely loitering on the 2nd floor at the time of the shooting. Looks like it's also EXTREMELY improbable LHO killed Tippitt as well since witnesses report the shooting occurred too early for Oswald to arrive at the scene. Oswald was exactly what he said he was: a patsy. I've seen not a bit of evidence in this case that isn't suspicious, which should be an indicator something isn't quite right. If Oswald was the lone killer, everything would fit nicely. Instead, the entire case is one contradiction after another that cannot be understood until we have read the accounts of the shocking events that took place at Bethesda in the morgue. For those of you who haven't read Douglas Horne's ARRB material, buckle up. You're in for a shock. David Lifton covered much of this ground in 1980 with "Best Evidence" but few really understood how important his research is. I interviewed him in 1986.
I wonder if Chapman can even begin to refute the facts or will resort to the usual deflecting sarcasm?