Just how dumb are you? When you have no evidence for what you are saying, you are assuming something. In this case that it was "likely"
I lived near a movie theater for many years. In your "logic" that makes it likely I would know the place, when I fact I never went in there and didn't know it at all. You are, once again, arguing for argument's sake.
Which was and still is an assumption not based on any fact.
When you wake up one morning and the streets are wet, you assume it rained, so you say it's likely it rained. But since you don't know for sure you just as easily could be wrong because a fire hydrant could have overflown as well. You calling something "likely" is nothing more than an assumption.
It's the kind of stuff you don't seem to understand. I'm sorry I can't dumb it down and get down to your level anymore. You're on your own. I'm beginning to understand why you are a die hard LN though....
When you have no evidence for what you are saying, you are assuming something. In this case that it was "likely"I said before in another thread that you two have a problem understanding the term "rational assumption." The rational part is the evidence that LHO lived in that neighborhood, that he liked watching movies, and that theaters offered a retreat from the summer heat. These are all perfectly good reasons to believe that it is likely that LHO had visited the TT.
I lived near a movie theater for many years. In your "logic" that makes it likely I would know the place, when I fact I never went in there and didn't know it at all. The word likely does not mean that it is positively true; just that the chances are good. Chances are good that most of the people who lived near a theater, liked watching movies, and would enjoy a little relief from the summer heat would have visited the theater. You might be an exception, and might not be the only one.
You are, once again, arguing for argument's sake.You are the one who started this ridiculous argument.
Which was and still is an assumption not based on any fact.Blatantly false, see the above statement regarding rational assumption.
When you wake up one morning and the streets are wet, you assume it rained, so you say it's likely it rained. But since you don't know for sure you just as easily could be wrong because a fire hydrant could have overflown as well. You calling something "likely" is nothing more than an assumption.It is more likely that the reason the streets are wet because of rain than it is because of a fire hydrant overflowing simply because it rains much more often than fire hydrants overflow. When I say something is likely, it implies that I could be wrong about whatever it is that I believe is likely. But the chances that I am wrong are low compared to the chances that I am correct; that is what likely means.
