Did Ruby really kill Oswald?

[Martin Weidmann]

The SBT is not "highly speculative" at all, IMO. Quite the opposite, in fact.

David, you wouldn't be presenting it, as a battle you think you can win, if you didn't believe that. However, that doesn't make you automatically correct. My entire point is that IMO the SBT is far from conclusive, no matter how many video representations are made for it.

[Martin Weidmann]

Is this a response to my posts?

No, it's just "Richard" venting one of his obsessions. It's of very little value.

[Dan O'meara]

No, it's just "Richard" venting one of his obsessions. It's of very little value.

I like the way he modestly refers to himself as an intellectual superior.

[Martin Weidmann]

I like the way he modestly refers to himself as an intellectual superior.

Of course he does. If he doesn't say it himself, who else will say it for him?

And to demonstrate just how superior he is; he shows that he doesn't even know it should be intellectually superior

Oh well, show me a fool and I'll show you a man who thinks he is a genius and intellectual superior.

[Richard Smith]

I like the way he modestly refers to himself as an intellectual superior.

That's a not a high bar around CTers.  And on a thread questioning whether Ruby killed Oswald!  HA HA HA.

[Martin Weidmann]

That's a not a high bar around CTers.  And on a thread questioning whether Ruby killed Oswald!  HA HA HA.

It's always the biggest idiot who proclaims himself to be superior.
People who truly are intellectually superior don't (need to) make such statements.

For crying out loud, "Richard" supports Trump, the biggest idiot of them all. That alone should tell you all you need to know.

[Bill Chapman]

This response is something I would expect from the tinfoil brigade.
I've made two serious points about the destruction of evidence and the complex of lies and deceit that permeates the testimonies of many of the TSBD employees.
You like to bang on about how all the evidence points to Oswald (who was a snivelling creep and most definitely involved) but when I point out key evidence has been destroyed you go into denial. Just like a good CTer.
You also can't deal with the point about the TSBD employees so you go into denial about that too.
It must be weird to be in the position you so often ascribe to others (and rightly so)
Be careful, I don't think you'd look good in metallic headgear.

Tell us who 'destroyed' the soda bottle with the 'key' evidence

And what makes you think I'm a Cter