Once again, do you place more value on the "ear" witnesses standing in an echo chamber over the eyewitnesses who could see and also hear what had happened? It appears you do.
I don't know what you're saying here.
Nobody was stood in an echo chamber.
All I'm saying is that the vast majority of witnesses in Dealey Plaza heard three shots. That's a fact. Why is that somehow discounted if they didn't actually see the bullets hit the target?
Are you saying the people unable to see what was happening in the limo knew more than the people who were in the limo?
No. That's a ridiculous thing to ask
Are you saying people outside the limo didn't know JFK had been shot because the could see it as well as hear it?
What??
Are you saying more than 150 witnesses who heard noises knew more than the people who actually witnessed the shooting?
Many of the people who heard the 'noises' also witnessed the shooting. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
The fact so many people heard three shots can lead us to conclude three audible shots were fired. That's it. What is it you think I'm saying?