So, you haven't seen and can not show the curtain rods with the markings from the manufacturer that were allegedly found at the TSBD by somebody you can not name. You have no evidence that the curtain rods Howlett gave the DPD on March 15th were actually found at the TSBD and you can't even show that the manufacturer did in fact mark the curtain rods they produced?
Lol, these questions are about as potent as the LNer's 'So you say Oswald didn't do it but you can't show me a photograph of the real shooter taking aim, eh?'
So, basically, all of this is nothing more than speculation on your part, right?
Not remotely correct, Mr Weidmann:
--------------------It is not speculation but fact that two curtain rods were submitted to the Crime Scene Search Section eight days before two curtain rods were formally taken from the Paine garage (3/15 vs. 3/23)........
How do you account for this fact, Mr Weidmann?--------------------It is not speculation but fact that these two curtain rods (the ones submitted 3/15) were submitted to be tested
for Mr Oswald's fingerprints........
Other than their having been found in the Depository building, how would you account for this fact, Mr Weidmann?--------------------It is not speculation but fact that numbering of the Ruth Paine exhibits began at the number 270..........
Can you offer a good reason why this number was chosen, Mr Weidmann?--------------------It is not speculation but fact that the digits 2-7-5 match
exactly the length of curtain rod (27.5 inches) taken from the Paine garage.........
Are you seriously suggesting this is a coincidence, Mr Weidmann?--------------------It is not speculation but fact that a variant version of the Crime Scene Search Section document, sans Howlett release signature and with different release date, went into the public record via the Warren volumes............
How do you account for this fact, Mr Weidmann?