Brennan has no credibility whatsoever.
From the DiEugenics guy over on the ED Forum:Lance:Just out of curiosity, how long have you been investigating this case?I say that because your urge to find closure on this issue, with conclusions that to most people would seem jerry built strikes me as being rather odd for any kind of person who is very familiar with this case. Also, your lack of any interviews or documentary research into the provenance of the money order is also puzzling.I mean lawyers are supposed to be ultra vigilant about the issues of chain of possession. That is, how did a piece of evidence get from one step to another, how did it originate? Because if there are any lacunae in that chain, the court, the jury and judge will look askance at that evidence.Yet, in your eagerness for finality, you have not asked one question about this issue. Therefore in just a matter of days and sixteen posts, you have done what say Gil Jesus, David Josephs, John Armstrong, Martha Moyer and the later Ray Gallagher could not do in literally years of research, going back to the nineties.Are you familiar with those issues at all? Have you researched them? Or are they irrelevant to you?
...........I think it is reasonable to expect it would have required bus loads of pre-assassination planners and post assassination coordinators and fakerymanagement to bring the beliefs and conclusions of DiEugenio and Sandy to the realm of possibilities.
Brennan has no credibility whatsoever.Then why have you used his statements to bolster your position that there was a man who was dressed in light colored khaki clothing aiming a hunting rifle from the SE corner window?