Why is not irrelevant since it was suggested that the FBI had a problem with the evidence that they needed to correct (i.e. the claim that Oswald had on a different shirt than the arrest shirt when he assassinated JFK). It's the "why" that sets this conspiracy fantasy in motion about convincing a witness to falsely testify about the shirt. But the FBI had no such problem. Why? LOL. Nothing in the "photos" or films precludes Oswald from having worn the arrest shirt at the time of the assassination. BUT even if he didn't wear that shirt when assassinating JFK, there is nothing to preclude the explanation that fibers from Oswald's shirt could have got on his rifle on some prior occasion. What is so difficult to understand about that? The FBI had no problem with the fiber evidence that needed fixing by falsifying witness testimony.
BUT even if he didn't wear that shirt when assassinating JFK, there is nothing to preclude the explanation that fibers from Oswald's shirt could have got on his rifle on some prior occasion. There is no such thing as "fibers from Oswald's shirt".
The FBI expert could only say that the fibers are similar to those of Oswald's shirt, not that they came from his shirt!
