In which the absurd claim is made once again that the evidence of Oswald's guilt is so overwhelming that we must conclude he is innocent.
What's absurd is "Richard Smith" has unleashed yet another strawman.
Why would Oswald retain his Hidell ID that links him to the rifle? LOL. Maybe he was an idiot. Lots of criminals do dumb things that result in their arrest and conviction.
And why would Oswald conceal a rifle in a homemade bag that he somehow constructed at work in advance and smuggled home from work without anybody noticing? Because he was clever enough to cover his tracks. Whatever it takes.
So as a evidentiary matter, even if Oswald gets rid of the Hidell SS card, he is still linked to the alias used to purchase the rifle.
Linked how? Oh yeah: unscientific and biased handwriting "analysis" of two block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a two-inch order coupon from microfilm that is "missing".
The rifle that was mailed to his PO Box
Which you still have yet to provide any evidence of.
and ends up at his place of employment with his prints on that rifle.
No matter how many times you keep bleating "his prints on that rifle", that doesn't make it true. The truth is that there were prints near the trigger guard area that were insufficient for identification purposes, and a single partial palmprint showed up a week later on an index card. This is why you are known as Lying "Richard".
It's a slam dunk of guilt.
So you keep claiming.
Even with the invention of the contrarian time machine, it would be difficult to figure out how there could be much more evidence to link Oswald to this crime.
It doesn't take any imagination at all to think up much better possible evidence. Too bad you don't have some.
