Was Hickey's AR15 in burst mode?

[Dan O'meara]

    The critical point that DQ's the Holland "Signal Strike Theory", is that Holland has Oswald STANDING and firing DOWNWARD through the 1/2 open window. Then, Oswald takes the time to sit down or squat down and fire his next 2 shots. What alleged "sniper" who takes the time to set-up a "nest", would then waste time changing his firing position and reacquiring the target? That "striking the signal" stuff is pure Farmer John Baloney. And then if you watch the Holland re-creation of the rifle being fired and then the falling position of the hulls after they were ejected from the rifle, the shooter uses a Scope Mounted rifle for Shot #1, and then a rifle with NO SCOPE for Shots #2 and #3. This Holland stuff merits being stacked between a couple of slices of Wonder Bread.

Holland examined the signal arm in microscopic detail and found no evidence to support his bizarre claim. Nothing.
Did this discovery inform his opinion about the matter?
Did it deter him from making this bizarre claim?
Of course it didn't because he's just another Tinfoil buffoon.

[Royell Storing]

Holland examined the signal arm in microscopic detail and found no evidence to support his bizarre claim. Nothing.
Did this discovery inform his opinion about the matter?
Did it deter him from making this bizarre claim?
Of course it didn't because he's just another Tinfoil buffoon.

   Holland and his "Signal Theory" are intended to bolster the Lone Nut theory. He's plugged into and protected by the LN'ers.  How else do you think this wild theory ever got the National attention it did and still does?

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Holland examined the signal arm in microscopic detail and found no evidence to support his bizarre claim. Nothing.
Did this discovery inform his opinion about the matter?
Did it deter him from making this bizarre claim?
Of course it didn't because he's just another Tinfoil buffoon.

Shot-1 ricocheted off one of the 2 guy rods, or possibly off the guy rod connection collar (no, it was off the guy rod), not the 2" main arm (steel pipe).
The guy rod was probly solid steel, not pipe. Hence there would be no damage, just some missing yellow paint.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Holland would have seen smoke from the autoburst & might have later remembered it as being in the trees.

bump.

[Royell Storing]

   You lock-steppers that echo the "signal strike" theory continue dancing around Oswald having to be in a STANDING POSITION to fire Downward through a 1/2 open window to even bring the signal into his firing line. And of course Oswald then allegedly needs to sit down or knell down, reacquire the target, and fire the 2nd and 3rd shots? Really? What "sniper" incorporates a "jack-in-the-box" routine such as this? Max Holland was also forced to MOVE the location of the JFK Limo on Elm St in addition to 2x'ing the total time for the 3 shots being fired. This "signal strike" theory has absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support it. NONE. Yet, you're the same parrots that go out of their way to trash Gordon Arnold and his story. And now we even have an image(s) of a "No Hat Cop" inside Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 to support a key part of the Gordon Arnold story. And, a recently discovered additional image.     ---------- TO BE CONTINUED  ------------

[Dan O'meara]

   You lock-steppers that echo the "signal strike" theory continue dancing around Oswald having to be in a STANDING POSITION to fire Downward through a 1/2 open window to even bring the signal into his firing line. And of course Oswald then allegedly needs to sit down or knell down, reacquire the target, and fire the 2nd and 3rd shots? Really? What "sniper" incorporates a "jack-in-the-box" routine such as this? Max Holland was also forced to MOVE the location of the JFK Limo on Elm St in addition to 2x'ing the total time for the 3 shots being fired. This "signal strike" theory has absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support it. NONE. Yet, you're the same parrots that go out of their way to trash Gordon Arnold and his story. And now we even have an image(s) of a "No Hat Cop" inside Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 to support a key part of the Gordon Arnold story. And, a recently discovered additional image.     ---------- TO BE CONTINUED  ------------

Yet, you're the same parrots that go out of their way to trash Gordon Arnold

Just to clarify, the Gordon Arnold story isn't just trashed by people who believe the farcical notion that the first shot hit the signal - it's trashed by everyone.
And rightly so, as it is clearly 

And now we even have an image(s) of a "No Hat Cop" inside Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63

No "we" don't.
We have a couple of blurry and completely indistinct images that can't tell us anything and that people have randomly decided to label a No Hat Cop.
And here you are, parroting it like it's a fact.

And, a recently discovered additional image.     ---------- TO BE CONTINUED  ------------

 
Oh, brother...

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

   You lock-steppers that echo the "signal strike" theory continue dancing around Oswald having to be in a STANDING POSITION to fire Downward through a 1/2 open window to even bring the signal into his firing line. And of course Oswald then allegedly needs to sit down or knell down, reacquire the target, and fire the 2nd and 3rd shots? Really? What "sniper" incorporates a "jack-in-the-box" routine such as this? Max Holland was also forced to MOVE the location of the JFK Limo on Elm St in addition to 2x'ing the total time for the 3 shots being fired. This "signal strike" theory has absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support it. NONE. Yet, you're the same parrots that go out of their way to trash Gordon Arnold and his story. And now we even have an image(s) of a "No Hat Cop" inside Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 to support a key part of the Gordon Arnold story. And, a recently discovered additional image.     ---------- TO BE CONTINUED  ------------

The signal ricochet hard evidence is ........
............the bits of lead in the galea on the right top of jfk's head (xray) &
............ the 2 halves of the brass jacket found in the limo &
............. the hole in the floor of the limo (photo).
The soft evidence is..........
............. witness statements that shot-1 was as the limo straightened up in Elm St (or similar).

I dont understand re Holland...... what do u mean that he had to move the limo?........ what do u mean that he had trouble with the timing of the shots?
I have never seen any such problems with Hollands work (the good bits of his work)(not the silly bits).

[Royell Storing]

The signal ricochet hard evidence is ........
............the bits of lead in the galea on the right top of jfk's head (xray) &
............ the 2 halves of the brass jacket found in the limo &
............. the hole in the floor of the limo (photo).
The soft evidence is..........
............. witness statements that shot-1 was as the limo straightened up in Elm St (or similar).

I dont understand re Holland...... what do u mean that he had to move the limo?........ what do u mean that he had trouble with the timing of the shots?
I have never seen any such problems with Hollands work (the good bits of his work)(not the silly bits).

        Gee, why am I Not Surprised that NOBODY addresses: (1) Mandated Oswald "jack-in-the-box" sniper maneuvers, (2) Altering the Limo location on Elm, or (3) Elapsed time for the 3 shots being DOUBLED to 12 Seconds, to slip this "signal strike" theory within the boundaries of Ball Park Plausible?