Read this thread (& my other threads).
If my Hickey theory is correct then u will not find one bit of hard evidence that contradicts it.
One strike & it is out.
I can call it my theory koz other Hickeyists say that Hickey fired only one shot -- i have shown that he fired at least 4 shots -- based on hard evidence.
If my Hickey theory is correct then u will not find one bit of hard evidence that contradicts it.Not a single witness saw it happen including those inches away from where the muzzle blast would have been.
Is that hard evidence contradicting your theory?
Obviously, I could argue that an invisible unicorn took the head shot and that you can't prove any differently. Is that the level you're working at?
Unless, of course, you have a reasonable [meaning 'credible'] explanation for why nobody heard or saw the shots being taken.
Do you have such an explanation?