Oswald's shot-2 was at Z218.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Oswald/CuckooNest/3Shots/twofer
Oswald/KilledTippit

I reckon that Oswald fired only twice (not counting Tippit). The jfk headshot wasnt a carcano fmj slug.
The whole  saga is a bewildering series of unlikely events.
The witness statements are a mess, so contradictory. Not helped by the leading questions. And the tampering with evidence. And the destruction of footage.

The police were the worst witnesses, worse than the ordinary citizens.  But the truth is in there, hidden by rubbish.

Surprisingly our best clues come from the Secret Service themselves, as  they should, they of course lied to coverup Hickey's actions, but they had to hedge their lies early on while they didnt know which way things would go, & thems little scraps of truth now help us to solve the case.

We need to see the 2019 copy of Bronson's 20 frames.  The 2017 copy is too blurry, But that concerns Hickey's shots, not Oswald's shot-2 which is the topic of this thread.

[Frederick Clements]

 The Hickey shot JFK theory was debunked long ago.

 Fred

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

The Hickey shot JFK theory was debunked long ago. Fred

No the debunking has been debunked by myself & others.
See my thread, the top link in the links below.
Hickey fired a 4 or 5 shot auto burst.

My pix in my postings keep loozing their link, koz Google Photo & Google Site keep changing the links almost every time i log on there, so i have to type in the new links some days. I now tend to use Flickr, i think they dont mess up their links, but they only allow small images on their free website. Still thinking.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2836.0.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2833.0.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,118.msg108350.html#msg108350
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,118.0.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2853.0.html


Look at all of my posts. Link below.
But my ideas re what happened have evolved over the 8 weeks i have been here, so some of my earlier ideas are a little or a lot wrong.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=674

Here below is my drawing which might be lost in some of the above threads/links.
U need to download & magnify. Damn flickr.


Here it is in google photos, if it works, needs luck.

[Bill Chapman]

No the debunking has been debunked by myself & others.
See my thread, the top link in the links below.
Hickey fired a 4 or 5 shot auto burst.

My pix in my postings keep loozing their link, koz Google Photo & Google Site keep changing the links almost every time i log on there, so i have to type in the new links some days. I now tend to use Flickr, i think they dont mess up their links, but they only allow small images on their free website. Still thinking.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2836.0.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2833.0.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,118.msg108350.html#msg108350
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,118.0.html
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2853.0.html


Look at all of my posts. Link below.
But my ideas re what happened have evolved over the 8 weeks i have been here, so some of my earlier ideas are a little or a lot wrong.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=674

Here below is my drawing which might be lost in some of the above threads/links.
U need to download & magnify. Damn flickr.

Just + your browser window, Marjan

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Just + your browser window, Marjan

Thanx for that.
Ok i found how to magnify the image using my google chrome. Hence i didnt have to download & save the image first, & then open with say microsoft office, & then magnify, ie it saved me all of that trouble.

But how did u manage to embed that there larger image in your posting?

Anyhow the magnified (free) flickr images are usually too grainy, i might go back to using (free) google photos or (free) google sites. I think that a one photo per album trick might prevent them from changing their damned image address every time i log on.  I might have to use my wife's computer to get the image address so that i dont auto log on.  Auto log on apparently auto sets the screen etc on edit mode i think which then gives a new address or something to some photos when one gets out of edit mode or something.

[Jerry Freeman]

No the debunking has been debunked by myself & others.

When you debunk a debunk would it be a rebunk?

[Bill Chapman]

Thanx for that.
Ok i found how to magnify the image using my google chrome. Hence i didnt have to download & save the image first, & then open with say microsoft office, & then magnify, ie it saved me all of that trouble.

But how did u manage to embed that there larger image in your posting?

Anyhow the magnified (free) flickr images are usually too grainy, i might go back to using (free) google photos or (free) google sites. I think that a one photo per album trick might prevent them from changing their damned image address every time i log on.  I might have to use my wife's computer to get the image address so that i dont auto log on.  Auto log on apparently auto sets the screen etc on edit mode i think which then gives a new address or something to some photos when one gets out of edit mode or something.

Marjan, sit tight for a day or two and I'll show you some stuff that might help you.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

When you debunk a debunk would it be a rebunk?

dedebunk -- undebunk -- yes needs its own good word.

The debunkers failed to explain JFK's head exploding, the cracked windshield, the dent in the chrome trim, the shots hitting tarmac & concrete in Elm St & Main St, Tague's bloody cheek, possibly the crater in the vertical corner of the concrete pier behind Tague.