So you are just reverting to that tired contrarian position after making the absurd comparison between Oswald and other employees who eventually left the building that day? Very lazy. A witness confirmed Oswald was on the bus only a short time after the Baker encounter. Another witness puts him in a cab and then another witness places him at his boarding house before 1PM. But you claim there is no evidence that he left immediately after the assassination? You dismiss all this evidence as the product of the "official story" whatever that means suggesting Oswald is basically the same as other employees who hung around the building chatting and giving their info to the police before leaving. LOL In order for Oswald to make these rounds around town as confirmed by multiple different witnesses within the known timeframes, his departure has to be immediate from his encounter with Baker. Within minutes after the assassination. He doesn't have a car or even a bicycle. He is on foot or using public transportation to get to these places.
Also, where in the building is he supposed to be after the Baker encounter? Let me guess. You have no clue and are just suggesting it is possible and asking others to disprove it to your subjective satisfaction while dismissing any actual evidence as the product of the "official story." But then also denying you are suggesting any conspiracy. Just multiple random citizens of Dallas all lying for some inexplicable reason to implicate Oswald. Round and round it goes down the rabbit hole of lunacy.
So you are just reverting to that tired contrarian position after making the absurd comparison between Oswald and other employees who eventually left the building that day? Very lazy. Stop making stuff up. I never made any kind of comparison.
A witness confirmed Oswald was on the bus only a short time after the Baker encounter. Another witness puts him in a cab and then another witness places him at his boarding house before 1PM. But you claim there is no evidence that he left immediately after the assassination? Indeed. The fact that Bledsoe, Whaley and Roberts all said they saw Oswald, tells us nothing about when exactly he left the building. You claim he left immediately, so where is the evidence for that?
You dismiss all this evidence as the product of the "official story" whatever that means suggesting Oswald is basically the same as other employees who hung around the building chatting and giving their info to the police before leaving. LOL Stop whining and making up strawmen
In order for Oswald to make these rounds around town as confirmed by multiple different witnesses within the known timeframes, his departure has to be immediate from his encounter with Baker. Within minutes after the assassination. Says who? The only witness who provided a kind of time stamp is Roberts, who said Oswald entered the roominghouse when she was about to watch the one o'clock news. Bledsoe's story has got holes in it bigger than Swiss cheese and Whaley only worked with 15 minutes on his time sheet.
Also, where in the building is he supposed to be after the Baker encounter? Who cares? Buell Frazier has gone on record that he saw Oswald walk down Houston street and turning onto Elm street about 15 minutes after the shooting. He figured Oswald had left the building at the loadingdock at the back and was going to buy his lunch.
Several witnesses have stated that they saw a man, that looked like Oswald, get in a Rambler.
So, why are these witnesses wrong and are those blindly accepted in the official narrative correct?
