Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: ?  (Read 46673 times)

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #96 on: July 28, 2021, 10:01:52 PM »
Advertisement
Signing off for now...back next week to reengage to read, listen & learn. Best wishes to all to remain safe, well & healthy amid COVID-19's reboot.


*Self-reminder: take a much closer look at the Wollensak recording equipment over the weekend to determine if Wollensak was in use by the Bureau during the late 1950's, early 1960's...If so one of these tape-recording systems could have quite easily been flown down from headquarters in Washington, D.C. to Dallas, Texas, making such equipment readily available during the wrongly-accused's multiple interrogations over that three day period...

The absence of audio & video recordings during those multiple-interrogations speaks volumes about why no audio & video recordings were made readily available for public consumption (Amazing what some lying treasonous cowards would do for thirty pieces of silver)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: ?
« Reply #96 on: July 28, 2021, 10:01:52 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: ?
« Reply #97 on: July 28, 2021, 11:15:16 PM »
Read your script Captain Fritz like a parrot...it's amazing what some people will do & say for thirty pieces of silver.

A genuine investigation, considering the magnitude of the unfolding worldwide event, would have quite easily secured means to a tape-recorder via another locality. or even Texas state resources/equipment, let alone via the Feds who were actively involved in the multiple interrogations w/the wrongly-accused.

Again, there's no audio & video recording of those multiple-interrogations. There's a reason for that. The wrongly-accused was simply telling the Truth, thus no audio & video recording could be shared with the general public/world.

Read your script Captain Fritz like a parrot
> Keep kissing Oswald's arse


BILL CHAPMAN
« Last Edit: July 28, 2021, 11:17:58 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: ?
« Reply #98 on: July 31, 2021, 04:50:36 PM »
The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

Correction

The wrongly-accused nobody did Not not shoot just anybody. He shot a somebody. Somebody.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: ?
« Reply #98 on: July 31, 2021, 04:50:36 PM »


Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #99 on: August 02, 2021, 08:31:30 PM »
Managed to uncover evidence confirming that the Bureau did in fact use Wollensak recording equipment in the early 60's (Page 2, paragraph 2) ---->

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/D%20Disk/Dallas%20Police%20Broadcasts/Item%2030.pdf

IF Captain Fritz genuinely cared to record those multiple-recordings he could have easily made a request of the Bureau to use their vast resources; however, he chose to parrot back the script in front of him about not having a tape-recorder (amazing what some lying treasonous cowards will do & say for thirty pieces of silver).

So, again, the reason why those multiple interrogations are void of audio & video recording is because the entire world would have heard the plain simple Truth from the wrongly accused (as oppose to the words put into his mouth by those Framing him).


Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #100 on: August 02, 2021, 08:54:58 PM »
The plain simple Truth:

*The wrongly-accused was standing outside on the steps of the front-entrance when the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People took place.

*12:33 Seen by a small storage-room on the first-floor by more than a few of his fellow TSBD employees returning into the building.

*12:34PM: Came to the aid of Inspector Sawyer (as no other TSBD male-employee-experience--movements/whereabouts that afternoon can account for being near that small storage-room and passenger elevators at that particular time).

*12:38PM: Upon stepping outside of the building via the front-entrance, he took a few seconds to point out where a rookie news reporter could find access to a telephone, before joining his supervisor, Mr. Shelley, down on lower Elm Street for 5-10 minutes...(thanks to Mr. Mentesana's home video capture).

Moreover, the only time the public was able to actually experience/listen & watch any audio & video recording of the wrongly-accused,  he made it crystal-clear he was innocent ---->


In addition...


It was following these exchanges with audio & video recording available for public-consumption that those framing him cleverly decided to void any further audio & video recording...choosing instead to put words into his mouth about what he said and what he did, yada, yada, yada along a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to Frame him.   

The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.



« Last Edit: August 02, 2021, 08:59:39 PM by Alan J. Ford »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: ?
« Reply #100 on: August 02, 2021, 08:54:58 PM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: ?
« Reply #101 on: August 02, 2021, 08:58:02 PM »
Managed to uncover evidence confirming that the Bureau did in fact use Wollensak recording equipment in the early 60's (Page 2, paragraph 2) ---->

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/D%20Disk/Dallas%20Police%20Broadcasts/Item%2030.pdf

IF Captain Fritz genuinely cared to record those multiple-recordings he could have easily made a request of the Bureau to use their vast resources; however, he chose to parrot back the script in front of him about not having a tape-recorder (amazing what some lying treasonous cowards will do & say for thirty pieces of silver).

So, again, the reason why those multiple interrogations are void of audio & video recording is because the entire world would have heard the plain simple Truth from the wrongly accused (as oppose to the words put into his mouth by those Framing him).

Could have been just the one recorder used at the FBI Lab. Not widely available or used in field offices. The FBI wanted a copy of the Dictabelt and had the recorder flown in.

The FBI then made notes during interviews, which were the basis of 302 reports. The Dallas Police then didn't record witness and suspect interviews. In the case of Oswald, they allowed the suspect to speak to the press.

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #102 on: August 02, 2021, 09:10:30 PM »
Appreciate your contribution to the discourse, Mr. Organ, however I personally don't believe the Bureau only had access to a single tape-recording machine, given how many field-offices they had all around the country. Do you have something those of reading along may reference confirming that the Bureau had only a single tape-recording machine?

Again, the reason no audio & video footage is readily available for public consumption has less to do with securing the necessary equipment for those multiple-interrogations than to void/suppress any means to display the wrongly-accused's complete innocence.


Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: ?
« Reply #103 on: August 02, 2021, 09:57:51 PM »
Last thought today, be safe everyone as COVID-19 rears its menace again...am leaving the following link here for further review later this week...

https://www.smecc.org/wollensak_tape_recorders.htm

Given the immense popularity of this equipment even as early as circa 1950's, IF Captain Fritz genuinely wanted to record those multiple-interrogations, he could have made an appeal to the general public for use of one. Whether it's the Bureau, the general public, etc., there was no genuine effort to secure the means to create audio & video sharing during those multiple-interrogations... very telling considering the magnitude of the case being "investigated".

Audio & video sharing for public consumption was simply voided at all cost because the wrongly-accused was telling the plain simple Truth. It was much easier to Frame him by putting words into his mouth (he said this, he said that; he did this, he did that) after he drew his last breath.

Brief recap:
*The wrongly-accused did Not board Mr. McWatters' bus, let alone request a bus-transfer.
*The cab driver--with a penchant for just guessing up "evidence" proclaims he only signed what he was told he said...
*Then there's the plain simple Truth (the wrongly-accused standing outside the front-entrance on the front steps when the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People took place; being seen by more than a few TSBD employees by a small storage room on the first floor; coming to the aid of Inspector Sawyer; and, pointing out where a rookie news reporter could find a phone as he himself stepped outside the front-entrance doors into the Autumn crisp air, venturing down Elm Street towards his supervisor, and standing w/the same for 5-10 minutes (thanks to Mr. Mentesana's home video footage).







JFK Assassination Forum

Re: ?
« Reply #103 on: August 02, 2021, 09:57:51 PM »