?

[John Iacoletti]

Only a true witch would deny being a witch.

[Alan J. Ford]

Didn't apply to Homicide Captains, you must have your notes mixed up:

Mr. FRITZ. I can remember the thing that I said to him and what he said to me, but I will have trouble telling you which period of questioning those questions were in because I kept no notes at the time, and these notes and things that I have made I would have to make several days later, and the questions may be in the wrong place.

An excellent point, Mr. Beck, appreciate your astute assessment.

*not to mention we aren't talking about an everyday, run of the mill usual-cases here...we are talking about the crime of the century, the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People, the highest representative of those People in a once free, open Democracy.

In a genuine investigation no stone would have been left unturned, not a single one; let alone a lame excuse about where on earth could audio & video equipment be secured...

IF those charged w/"investigating" this case wished to investigate this case, they would have quite easily realised the news reporters all around them for those several days, in tow with vast means/ access to all the audio & video equipment they needed. There's no excuse why any of those multiple interrogations were void of audio & video recordings.

Again, the reason why there is no audio & video recordings readily available for public-consumption is very telling. The wrongly-accused was simply telling the Truth (about his genuine whereabouts that afternoon). He was much easier to Frame by avoiding audio & video for public-consumption in favor of inserting words into his mouth after he drew his last breath. 

[Alan J. Ford]

Only a true witch would deny being a witch.

Profound, Mr. Iacoletti, as keen as your exemplary research in this case.

Some people just know the difference between a hastily contrived script built on a flimsy foundation of straw as oppose to the rock-solid plain simple Truth. The plain simple Truth isn't an incubator for breeding more and more questions, which, on the other hand, runs rampant amid the hastily contrived script to Frame an innocent party...so much so in a manner that is difficult to control as each falsehood breeds even more...

The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

 

 

 

[Alan J. Ford]

Mr. Mytton,

Still having a difficult time producing any actual, credible evidence bearing the wrongly-accused's own voice describing that phantom bus ride & cab ride eh?

Those of us reading along, Mr. Mytton, we understand why...there's a Major difference between the scripted fantasy of a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to Frame an innocent party and actual evidence...

as oppose to manufactured "evidence", which was so much easier to produce after the innocent party drew his last breath. Last chance/opportunity, Mr. Mytton ---->

Share w/us any actual, credible evidence bearing the wrongly-accused's own voice describing that phantom bus ride & cab ride eh?

If you continue to find this challenge rather difficult, there's a reason for that...

the plain simple Truth requires no script...the plain simple truth speaks for itself...only a script requires fantasy-"evidence", manufactured rather than genuine. In fairness to you, those of us reading along await your evidence in the wrongly-accused's own voice.... about that phantom bus ride, bus transfer, yada, yada, yada...

[Alan J. Ford]

German native Rudolph Brenk, a general supervisor at Exline-Lowdon
Company and vice-president of the Camera Guild of Texas, an 8mm camera club...Brenk was president of the 18 members of the "Dallas Cinema Associates, Inc.

*Source: exemplary research of Mr. Weisberg (Harold)

Per a white pages telephone search today, Mr. Brenk may still be alive ---->

Rudolph V Brenk from Greenville, TX
Age: 101 years old

What a gold mine IF he still has much of the film the 18 members of the group did not use in their finished product, the Dallas Cinema Associates filming sequence. Of course, they didn't have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, or being in two places, where a sharp eyed DCA member, with a keen sense of attention-to-detail noticed the man apprehended in the Texas Theatre wore the same clothing (brown shirt & grey coloured pants), filmed earlier upon the man captured in Mr. Mentesana's home movie filming sequence, standing outside down on lower Elm Street w/his supervisor, thus special agent Bookhout's notes revealing the wrongly-accused's assertion to that fact...for, quote, "5-10 minutes".

It's no coincidence that both men are of the same build either. Same hair color. The wrongly-accused did Not board a bus, let alone ask for the manufactured bus-transfer "evidence" planted after that intense physical struggle with five officers. The wrongly-accused was nowhere near, let alone responsible for the events across town at 10th & Patton. Mr. Mentesana's home movie places him still in Dealey Plaza loooong after the  hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure has him "escaping" via a bus, a taxi, hitching a ride upon the exploits of the magic-bullet bs, etc yada, yada, yada.

Back later this week to reengage, listen & learn. Perhaps by then Mr. Mytton may produce some actual, credible evidence from the wrongly-accused's own voice about that phantom bus & cab ride, rather than continue to rely upon manufactured "evidence" to Frame him. Quite easy to Frame the wrongly-accused after he drew his last breath...He said this. He said that. He did this. He did that.

Contrary to the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure amid manufactured "evidence" ---->

The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[John Mytton]

German native Rudolph Brenk, a general supervisor at Exline-Lowdon
Company and vice-president of the Camera Guild of Texas, an 8mm camera club...Brenk was president of the 18 members of the "Dallas Cinema Associates, Inc.

*Source: exemplary research of Mr. Weisberg (Harold)

Per a white pages telephone search today, Mr. Brenk may still be alive ---->

Rudolph V Brenk from Greenville, TX
Age: 101 years old

What a gold mine IF he still has much of the film the 18 members of the group did not use in their finished product, the Dallas Cinema Associates filming sequence. Of course, they didn't have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, or being in two places, where a sharp eyed DCA member, with a keen sense of attention-to-detail noticed the man apprehended in the Texas Theatre wore the same clothing (brown shirt & grey coloured pants), filmed earlier upon the man captured in Mr. Mentesana's home movie filming sequence, standing outside down on lower Elm Street w/his supervisor, thus special agent Bookhout's notes revealing the wrongly-accused's assertion to that fact...for, quote, "5-10 minutes".

It's no coincidence that both men are of the same build either. Same hair color. The wrongly-accused did Not board a bus, let alone ask for the manufactured bus-transfer "evidence" planted after that intense physical struggle with five officers. The wrongly-accused was nowhere near, let alone responsible for the events across town at 10th & Patton. Mr. Mentesana's home movie places him still in Dealey Plaza loooong after the  hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure has him "escaping" via a bus, a taxi, hitching a ride upon the exploits of the magic-bullet bs, etc yada, yada, yada.

Back later this week to reengage, listen & learn. Perhaps by then Mr. Mytton may produce some actual, credible evidence from the wrongly-accused's own voice about that phantom bus & cab ride, rather than continue to rely upon manufactured "evidence" to Frame him. Quite easy to Frame the wrongly-accused after he drew his last breath...He said this. He said that. He did this. He did that.

Contrary to the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure amid manufactured "evidence" ---->

The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

Back later this week to reengage, listen & learn.

No offence, but you are a certifiable Nut!
Firstly you haven't engaged anyone, all you do is repeat the same worthless mantra post after post and because a recording doesn't exist you are claiming some sort of hollow victory, the excess of self inflated ego on display is staggering.
Secondly you haven't listened to my extremely potent argument that inventing a bus ride to nowhere is illogical and achieves nothing and then you have the audacity to ignore my sensible in depth refutation that the group of diverse interrogators in fact didn't invent anything that may actually have been an advantage in the eyes of the public in convicting Oswald, for instance you have been as silent as a church mouse re the interrogation facts that I outlined above but let me repeat them because they absolutely obliterate any credibility that you have left.

Oswald denied ordering the rifle.
Oswald claimed he never owned a rifle.
Oswald denied going to Mexico in the previous couple of months.
Oswald claimed he only took his lunch to work.
Oswald denied that the backyard photo was him.
Oswald denied carrying a a long package to work on the 22nd.
Oswald denied putting said package on the back seat of Frazier's automobile.
Oswald lied about living at Neely street, obviously because that's where the BY photo was taken.
Oswald wouldn't spill the beans even when he was about to draw his last breath.

And thirdly you will never learn because as I pointed out above, you are a Nut!

Quite easy to Frame the wrongly-accused after he drew his last breath...He said this. He said that. He did this. He did that.

Wtf?, because they invented an irrelevant bus trip that lasted all of a few blocks, you can't be serious, how about if "they" invented;

Oswald admitted owning the rifle.
Oswald admitted hating Kennedy.
Oswald admitted going to Mexico.
Oswald admitted carrying a large package.
Oswald admitted that the backyard photos were actually Oswald.
Oswald admitted as he drew his final breath that he was a double murderer.

But alas they never did which subsequently makes your petty accusation on an inconsequential bus trip utterly pointless.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Again, the reason why there is no audio & video recordings readily available for public-consumption is very telling. The wrongly-accused was simply telling the Truth (about his genuine whereabouts that afternoon). He was much easier to Frame by avoiding audio & video for public-consumption in favor of inserting words into his mouth after he drew his last breath.

Rinse, wash, repeat! Yawn!



Oswald's final "genuine whereabouts on that afternoon" are crystal clear, Oswald was arrested at the Texas Theatre, that is beyond dispute and if Oswald didn't use public transport or private commercial transportation to get to the general vicinity then I'm afraid the only logical alterative is that someone took him there, someone who disappeared?



The evidence that may lead to some sort of alternate method of conveyance is Roger Craig's testimony that about 14 to 15 minutes after the first shot he observed what he believes was Oswald running toward a station wagon being driven by a very dark complected man but unfortunately for the Oswald defenders this opens a serious new can of worms. According to Truly, Oswald's lunch break was between 12:00 to 12:45, meaning that unless this meeting was pure coincidence then this rendezvous was prearranged for the very end of Oswald's lunch break and how could Oswald possibly know beforehand that the President would be shot and thereafter work would be abandoned, unless he was involved?

Mr. BELIN - Now, about how many minutes was this after the time that you had turned that young couple over to Lemmy Lewis that you heard this whistle?
Mr. CRAIG - Fourteen or 15 minutes.
Mr. BELIN - Fourteen or 15 minutes?
Mr. CRAIG - Yes.
Mr. BELIN - Was this, you mean, after the shooting?
Mr. CRAIG - After the---from the time I heard the first shot.
Mr. BELIN - All right. Your heard someone whistle?
Mr. CRAIG - Yes. So I turned and--uh-saw a man start to run down the hill on the north side of Elm Street, running down toward Elm Street.

JohnM

[Alan J. Ford]

Mr. Mytton, still stuck in reverse eh?...still stuck in desperation, back-pedaling mode as far away from producing any actual, credible evidence in the wrongly-accused's own voice about that phantom bus & cab ride. Those of us reading along here, we understand how difficult this challenge is for you.

All you have is what they said he said and did, What part of that don't you understand?

Now, once more, produce and share some actual, credible evidence void of putting words into his mouth ---->

he said this, he said that; or, he did this, he did that. Quite a challenge for you, going on nearly a month so far. There's a reason for that. You cannot do it, Mr. Mytton, Can you? It's that simple really (the plain simple Truth usually is, no hearsay this and no hearsay that needed)

The only two times the general public was privy to actual audio & video where one can actually hear the wrongly-accused's own voice, he told us all we really needed to know ---->

Anything else contrary to his own statement(s) is nothing more than a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure amid manufactured "evidence" to Frame an innocent party. Quite easy to Frame someone when actual audio & video recording of them is avoided at all cost. His silencing being the most costly. 

Now, once more, All you have is what they said he said & did, What part of that don't you understand? You do understand the difference between what the wrongly-accused actually said--in his own voice--see above video-- as oppose to what others said he said & did?, putting words into his mouth to Frame him?

If you think/feel differently, take this extended opportunity to share right here with the rest of us some actual credible evidence in his own voice...we understand if you continue to back-pedal in reverse as far away from this challenge as you can.