Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[Bill Brown]

It wasn't Marcia Clark's fault.  Christopher Darden is the person who screwed the pooch.

[Martin Weidmann]

It wasn't Marcia Clark's fault.  Christopher Darden is the person who screwed the pooch.

Agreed

[John Iacoletti]

Irrelevant to Richard Smith's valid point.

When arrested, Oswald had both Remingtons and Winchesters loaded into the revolver taken from him; three of each.

"the revolver taken from him".  LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

Wrong.  How does a DPD officer possessing the evidence leave "the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation"?  That is baseless and stupid even coming from you.  The mere baseless opinion that something is "possible" does not rebut the evidence.

The mere baseless opinion that a revolver was "taken from Oswald" doesn't make it so.

[John Iacoletti]

Do you really think the OJ trial/defense is the way that evidence should be reviewed in the JFK case?  Laughable.  The question is not whether some rube juror can be fooled by a dim witted defense attorney making a baseless claim like evidence was planted but whether Oswald committed the crime.

What we've learned is that some rube guy who goes by "Richard" can be fooled into thinking that WC "conclusions" are evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

LOL.  You see no evidentiary value in Oswald having a pistol in his possession when arrested?

Except he didn't.  Or a revolver for that matter.  At the time Oswald was arrested, the alleged revolver was in the alleged possession of the alleged Bob Carroll.

[Bill Brown]

"the revolver taken from him".  LOL.

Yes.  Correct.  Now what?

[John Iacoletti]

If a criminal could avoid culpability for a crime by just claiming that it was "possible" that the overwhelming evidence of his guilt was planted, then no one would ever go to jail.

If all that police could come up with in criminal cases is this level of weak, circumstantial, and tainted evidence, then no one should go to jail.