"Richard's" usual litany of unsupported claims.
Let's try one last time. Do you accept that Oswald had the same two types of ammo when he was arrested that were used to kill Tippit or not?
No. All we know is that some Winchester bullets were "found" in Oswald's pocket
hours after he was arrested.
The DPD indicates that they recovered a pistol and ammo from Oswald after his arrest.
No they don't. At the time of Oswald's arrest, the alleged revolver (not pistol) was allegedly in the alleged possession of the alleged Bob Carroll.
You cannot suggest that a different pistol or ammo was entered into evidence and deny that you are suggesting the evidence was manipulated. Both cannot be true.
I see you need yet another lesson on the concept of burden of proof. Why do you think chain of custody and evidence handling procedures are even a thing? Because police have the burden of demonstrating the authenticity of the evidence they present. If "cop said so" was good enough, then there would be no need for such procedures.
And imagine the narrative behind this fantasy where the DPD switch the pistol and plant the ammo. The DPD decide, for some unspecified reason, to frame Oswald for the Tippit murder right from the beginning. Why they do this is left completely unaddressed. They not only frame Oswald for the crime, but they must decide to let the guilty person go free. They must know who this guilty person is since they somehow acquire his pistol and switch it for the one that Oswald (bad luck again) has decided to carry to the movie.
No, Strawman "Smith". Since there's actually no conclusive way to connect any particular weapon to Tippit's death, all anybody has to do is present a weapon and some matching shells, and claim with no substantiation that the weapon was taken away from the suspect and that the shells were found at the scene.
"Brief delay in logging the evidence". LOL.
