Reburied after the exhumation as far as I know.
Try it and see what happens. If there is a match I'll be the first to accept it.
Accept what?
What part of "If there is a match I'll be the first to accept it." do you not understand?
You are so dishonest and biased it could mean anything. There is already overwhelming evidence of Oswald's guilt in the murder of Tippit. And yet you do not "accept it" but suggest that evidence is the product of fakery and mistaken identity in a wildly improbable series of events that all just happen to point to Oswald's guilt. Why would DNA evidence be any different? So why not just state what you you mean by "accept it" in this context? Why the reluctance if it is so apparent?
Is whining all you can do? It's not my fault that a liar as you needs to be held to a higher standard of evidence than the one you like.Btw your pathetic obsession with me is duly noted.
Note: The above Weidmann reply was made to Richard Smithyour [pathetic] obsession with me is duly notedTry to come up with something original instead of hanging onto my coatails, plagiarist.A bunch of fkn amateurs, the lot of you.