It's "who's 'we'" not "who's 'us.'" You had one word to quote, only one, and you couldn't even get it right. Which leads straight into your next line:
Jabs aside, "we" are all the people who've noted over the years that your "I'm jes' an honest sceptic" act is belied by it's one-sided nature. My stated observation and Jeey 's and Mytton's quacks-like-a-duck cartoon takes are the latest examples.
They're worth more than all the sour grapes in your arsenal.
Iacoletti's, hey man I'm just a neutral observer and therefore I must be taken seriously schtick was undone with his very first post and thousands of posts later, for reasons known only to himself, he still persists with this delusion. As you have pointed out, the constant blatant contradictions of his accusations is absurd, for example the Police are all corrupt except when they're not?
And as for Iacoletti calling my Visual Educational Aids, a cartoon, or squiggly lines or coloured blobs or whatever without any scientific basis for his objection is equally absurd, but considering he believes that the Zapruder film "seemed" to be going backwards, well, I take any objection of his with a grain of salt.
It's also quite ironic that he splashes around "LOL" with such gay abandon when he actually comes across as a very bitter and disturbed man, but hey whatever, it's a free country and I'll defend his right to say whatever he likes because in the end every time he opens his mouth he's only shredding his own credibility and doing himself a massive disservice.
Btw, the way "Iacoletti's" attempts to discredit a poster by putting a members name's in "quotation marks" is also baffling, not one member here has ever proved that they are who they say they are, and especially not to Iacoletti's unrealistic high standard of proof but again it is what it is, but it does remind me of a time when he tried to convince me that CT members here used their real names but when I produced a post of Caprio's where he admitted to using an alias and I asked Weidmann who as predicted was supporting Iacoletti, to produce some ID, which I explained could have any personal info redacted, to prove Weidmann's name was actually Weidmann and lo and behold the usual chorus of crickets was his response and thereafter Iacoletti withdrew his argument, put his tail between his legs and we never heard squat again.
