JFK Was Shot From The Front

[Dan O'meara]

Larry Sturdivan said to the Select Committee:

    "The deposit of momentum from the bullet is not sufficient to cause
     any dramatic movement in any direction. It would have a very slight
     movement, assuming that the bullet hit him in the back of the head.
     It would have a slight movement toward the front, which would very
     rapidly be damped by the connection of the neck with the body."

It's been proposed that a neuromuscular reaction, the temporary cavity left behind by a bullet or "jet effect" (or a combination therefore) may account for the rearward/leftward head recoil.

"The deposit of momentum from the bullet is not sufficient to cause
 any dramatic movement in any direction. It would have a very slight
 movement, assuming that the bullet hit him in the back of the head."

This cannot be reconciled with the massive amount of damage done to JFK's skull (as shown in John Mytton's graphic Gifs), portions of which fly off at tremendous speed.
Immense forces are required to do this amount of damage and must be reflected in the movement of JFK's head.

[Jerry Organ]

Uh, oh Jerry Organ!

The conspiracy to eliminate the massive wound on the side of his head has once again made itself manifest.

In 1972, Dr. John K. Lattimer examined the photographs and X-rays purportedly from President Kennedy’s autopsy that are on file at the National Archives, and he testified to the Rockefeller Commission in 1975 that they show a “large wound of exit on the front top of the President’s head” where the bullet “exited on the front of the head, just above the forehead.”

In February 1968, four years before Dr. Lattimer examined the autopsy material, Attorney General Ramsey Clark assembled a panel of four physicians to examine the autopsy photographs and X-rays, after which the “Clark Panel” issued a report stating that the bullet “passed forward” to “explosively fracture the right frontal and parietal bones as it emerged from the head.”

In March 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations had their “Medical Panel” examine the autopsy photographs and listen to the testimony of President Kennedy’s three pathologists, after which the Medical Panel concluded, “The bullet exited in the top front area of the skull.”

Funny the Committee allowed this to be published on their behalf.

And look how President Kennedy’s three pathologists have been enlisted to cover up the fact that he had a massive wound on the side of his head. It was in the autopsy report, but now we find that “the bullet exited in the top front area of the skull.”

The autopsy report says absolutely nothing about the front of the head.

Oh, please, Jerry Organ, save us from this massive conspiracy to eliminate the gaping wound on the side of the head.

And to anyone else reading this post, check out my book, which lays out the most shocking information that has ever come forth on corruption in the CIA and the United States government.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

More lame cherry-picks and cheap theatrical semantics. One, however, doesn't quite work for you: "the right frontal and parietal bones". Probably what the rest mean by "top front" . I don't know what you mean, unless you think there was a gaping hole in Kennedy's forehead or face. No LNer proposed such a thing, nor has any medical observer.

Aw well. Now anyone can gauge the quality of your "book" by your childish rants and failure to address the "right"-side wound descriptions.

[Anthony Frank]

I will take the multitude of eyewitness descriptions (see my first post) over fabricated autopsy photos and the pathologists cover up any day.

[Bill Chapman]

Jackie: 'Top, behind the forehead'

You know; the witness who had the best seat in the house.

[John Mytton]

So, Doctors Jones and Perry, who “took over the primary management” in the emergency room where one of their objectives was to “assess how bad his head injury was,” could not actually see “what appeared to be an exit wound in the posterior portion of the skull.”

Doctors Jones and Perry could not actually see “a large wound of the right posterior cranium,” and they could not see that President Kennedy had “a large avulsive wound on the right posterior cranium.”

Seeing as how Doctors Jones and Perry “took over the primary management” in the emergency room and they were supposed to “assess how bad his head injury was,” they must have been grossly incompetent to ignore a massive opening on the side of the head.

The grossly incompetent doctors lied about the wound at the back of the head. They were clearly part of the conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front.

Parkland Nurse Pat Hutton was asked to “place a pressure dressing on the head wound,” but it “was of no use, however, because of the massive opening on the back of the head.” She obviously saw "the very back of the head," but she was clearly lying because the wound was actually on the side of the head.

Hutton was clearly part of the conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front.

Dr. Charles Carrico clearly lied when he claimed that he observed that “blood and brain were extruding” from a head wound “in the occipital region of the skull.”

Dr. Charles Carrico was clearly part of the conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front. He was not mistaken. He was a “shot from the front” conspirator, who thought he could gloss over what he did by changing his story in 1992.

I could go on, but you have me convinced that there was a massive conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front. And it all started with Secret Service Special Agent Clint Hill, who clearly lied when he wrote in his report that he saw that “a portion of the President’s head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone.”

Now that you have me convinced of the massive conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front, which, of course, is why none of these witnesses said anything about a massive wound on the side of the head, can you tell me why everyone engaged in this conspiracy?

And since Merv Griffin stopped doing his show in 1986 and has since died, I will take this opportunity to plug my book, which is meticulously sourced and rife with documentation from beginning to end and lays out the most shocking information that has ever come forth on corruption in the CIA and the United States government.

Click the link.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

Hilarious, when you closely examine the "back of head" eyewitnesses there is absolutely zero corroboration on where they thought they saw the wound, the prosecution would rip these eyewitnesses a new one....



Whereas all the authenticated physical evidence is actually corroborated by a number of Parkland staff along with a stack of civilians.



Btw waving your hand and proclaiming the autopsy evidence as an inconvenient truth is really poor form and does nothing to promote your case, how about proving that the rotating morphs which I posted are based on fake images and tell us how they created two views which can be combined into mathematically perfect stereoscopic images?





JohnM

[Ray Mitcham]

The doctors at Parkland were so inefficient they couldn't see the massive wound on the top of the head. They saw a hole the size of an orange a behind the right ear, and even got the fact that they saw cerebellum coming out of the wound wrong. How did these guys get their degrees?

Ignore the facts of the case, and just judge dodgy photos provided by the authorities.

John, please show us how you know the photos are of JFK.

[Jerry Organ]

The doctors at Parkland were so inefficient they couldn't see the massive wound on the top of the head. They saw a hole the size of an orange a behind the right ear,

So it was on the right side, not full-on at the occiput. And where do the Parkland doctors position the gaping wound relative to the ear?

and even got the fact that they saw cerebellum coming out of the wound wrong.

There are similarities even with the brain removed and cleaned. Kennedy's brain at Parkland was inside a skull with a fresh wound and a scalp with thick matted hair. Furthermore a resuscitation effort isn't the same as a formal autopsy.

How did these guys get their degrees?

It would seem not from Bob Jones, Liberty or Bingham Young University.

Ignore the facts of the case, and just judge dodgy photos provided by the authorities.

John, please show us how you know the photos are of JFK.

The pathologists verified the autopsy photos as the ones they took at Bethesda. End of.

[Bill Chapman]

The doctors at Parkland were so inefficient they couldn't see the massive wound on the top of the head. They saw a hole the size of an orange a behind the right ear, and even got the fact that they saw cerebellum coming out of the wound wrong. How did these guys get their degrees?

Ignore the facts of the case, and just judge dodgy photos provided by the authorities.

John, please show us how you know the photos are of JFK.

The Parkland doctors were not focussed on performing an autopsy. They were primarily focussed on reviving Kennedy. They hadn't even turned him over, FFS.