Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald

[Walt Cakebread]

Li'l Lee lovingly wrapped the gun so nothing would snag.

If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted.

What makes you think there would be fresh oil on a stored rifle? Is there some law?

What about the weird indents on the paper bag? The shapes near the midpoint of the bag where the trigger-guard and bolt would have been.

"If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted."

B.S.!!! I'm not an Lner.....  I accept the facts and the physical evidence.....   Unlike a gutless LNer who's mantra is denial.....

[Bill Chapman]

These delusions do not affect the evidence.

What is your problem?

Stop dodging. You called me a racist.
Now bugger off.

[Vincent Baxter]

"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha.      C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....


"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag, and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

This would be the same FBI who have been accused of (or were in cohorts with) doctoring the backyard photos, planting the pristine CE399 bullet on the stretcher, confiscating and "losing" cameras and photos of the assassination, murdering witnesses, etc, etc, and basically doing all they can to cover up any conspiracy theories connected to the assassination?

It's funny how they were capable of doing all of the above but weren't capable of planting a few blanket fibres on a rifle.

What is even funnier is how you probably dismiss the FBI's conclusion on all of the aforementioned and the fact that they concluded that Oswald acted alone after undertaking more than 25000 interviews and tens of thousands of investigative leads, and yet you are so quick to take their word as gospel and use it as 100% reliable evidence on this matter when it suits your narrative of events.

[Bill Chapman]

"If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted."

B.S.!!! I'm not an Lner.....  I accept the facts and the physical evidence.....   Unlike a gutless LNer who's mantra is denial.....

Bull. Even one of your ilk has a long list out of your fabrications, Fakebread.

[Bill Chapman]

This would be the same FBI who have been accused of (or were in cohorts with) doctoring the backyard photos, planting the pristine CE399 bullet on the stretcher, confiscating and "losing" cameras and photos of the assassination, murdering witnesses, etc, etc, and basically doing all they can to cover up any conspiracy theories connected to the assassination?

It's funny how they were capable of doing all of the above but weren't capable of planting a few blanket fibres on a rifle.

What is even funnier is how you probably dismiss the FBI's conclusion on all of the aforementioned and the fact that they concluded that Oswald acted alone after undertaking more than 25000 interviews and tens of thousands of investigative leads, and yet you are so quick to take their word as gospel and use it as 100% reliable evidence on this matter when it suits your narrative of events.

Um.. Cakebread is a CTer..

[Vincent Baxter]

Um.. Cakebread is a CTer..

I know, that was my point.
I was highlighting the fact that CTers often accuse the FBI of wrong doing or planting evidence when it goes against their bs theory but as soon as a finding by the FBI fits their argument (in this case no evidence linking the Carcano to the blanket) they present it is bona fide gospel

[Walt Cakebread]

I know, that was my point.
I was highlighting the fact that CTers often accuse the FBI of wrong doing or planting evidence when it goes against their bs theory but as soon as a finding by the FBI fits their argument (in this case no evidence linking the Carcano to the blanket) they present it is bona fide gospel

Let's not bicker....  Let's simply face the FACTS....   The FBI Lab reported that there were NO blanket fibers on the carcano.

Can you explain how that could be possible if that rifle had been wrapped in that blanket  for two months

[Vincent Baxter]

Let's not bicker....  Let's simply face the FACTS....   The FBI Lab reported that there were NO blanket fibers on the carcano.

Can you explain how that could be possible if that rifle had been wrapped in that blanket  for two months

It could quite easily have been wrapped in something else before it was wrapped and hidden in the blanket in question.
I quite often double wrap things if I'm putting them away in storage, so its not exactly an absurd notion especially if it's an item that he probably didn't want discovered. In fact the more I think about it the more logical it would have been to have actually wrapped it in multiple layers.

More to the point, how would you explain the single blanket fibre the FBI found on the paper bag? It might be just a mere single fibre but do you not find it a bit strange that a fibre from a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage found turned up at the TSBD?