Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald  (Read 26048 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #88 on: July 22, 2021, 10:31:07 AM »
Advertisement
Oswald coming down east sidewalk, no way.

Too difficult to measure?

I did notice your posts got a good cleaning....

While we're waiting, how does "grade 8" rate on your scale?

Tell us why Callaway would 'holler' at Oswald if he was only 10 feet away
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 10:42:23 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #88 on: July 22, 2021, 10:31:07 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #89 on: July 22, 2021, 02:01:48 PM »
Who heard Callaway 'holler'?

BTW, why did you dodge my question about your grade system?

Happened once before.

'Who heard Callaway 'holler'?'
> Oswald

'BTW, why did you dodge my question about your grade system?'
> Grade 8 will get you Guinyard's job. But not Callaway's

You keep dodging "race card"
Happened several times before

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #90 on: July 22, 2021, 02:24:14 PM »
Oswald coming down east sidewalk, no way.

Too difficult to measure?

I did notice your posts got a good cleaning....

While we're waiting, how does "grade 8" rate on your scale?

Oswald was said (under oath by college guy with no reason to lie) to have come down the west sidewalk. Way. By measured 55 feet.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #90 on: July 22, 2021, 02:24:14 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #91 on: July 22, 2021, 06:36:28 PM »
Name guy.

3rd dodge.

Pattern?

East is East and West is West, and never the Twain shall meet. Not unless a double-murderer crosses from one side of the street to the other in order to avoid a close encounter with yet another witness.

'Name guy'
> The same colleged-up guy whom Oswald heard say 'Hey, man, what the hell is going on?' hollered at him. The same colleged-up guy who Oswald then looked at, shrugged, then continued on his way.

'Pattern?'
> That's one way to couch your continued "race card" dodge

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #92 on: July 22, 2021, 08:36:29 PM »
No amount of poetry will get you out of this mess.

Witnesses were evidently not a problem for the shooter (ask Markham).

Another fail.

BS.

Guinyard also testified under oath and had no (apparent) reason to lie.

Your continued streak of failures - - LOL

Cite.

Why would a genius not own up to his own class grade theory?

So, it doesn't cover grade 8 yet?

Your Grade 8 Certificate will get you Guinyard's job but not Callaway's
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 08:37:47 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #92 on: July 22, 2021, 08:36:29 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #93 on: July 22, 2021, 10:28:45 PM »
From Britannica:

Henry Ford, (born July 30, 1863, Wayne county, Michigan, U.S.—died April 7, 1947, Dearborn, Michigan), American industrialist who revolutionized factory production with his assembly-line methods.

Ford attended a one-room school for eight years when he was not helping his father with the harvest.

Why would I waste time flipping cars when I can OWN my own car factory?

Another epic Chapman FAIL, sweet.

You're no Henry Ford and neither is Guinyard
« Last Edit: July 23, 2021, 01:31:12 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #94 on: July 22, 2021, 11:29:17 PM »
No amount of poetry will get you out of this mess.

Witnesses were evidently not a problem for the shooter (ask Markham).

Another fail.

BS.

Guinyard also testified under oath and had no (apparent) reason to lie.

Your continued streak of failures - - LOL

Cite.

Why would a genius not own up to his own class grade theory?

So, it doesn't cover grade 8 yet?

(re "race card")
'Cite'
> Okay. From my files:

                  Original quote. 'Today' is actually July 17. See info below.



                  This graphic is from the troll-face section which was 'cleaned' as you mentioned. I removed the large troll-face which 
                   originally accompanied the large, bold text seen in the above graphic.               
                  By the way, how convenient of you to call for a cite from material which you damn well know is no longer up

                  Consider yourself schooled, Professor.
                 
               
« Last Edit: July 23, 2021, 02:46:09 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #95 on: July 23, 2021, 12:09:00 AM »

'Witnesses were evidently not a problem for the shooter (ask Markham)'
> Deflection. Far different dynamics at murder scene
« Last Edit: July 23, 2021, 12:32:50 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #95 on: July 23, 2021, 12:09:00 AM »