Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald

[Walt Cakebread]

I know, that was my point.
I was highlighting the fact that CTers often accuse the FBI of wrong doing or planting evidence when it goes against their bs theory but as soon as a finding by the FBI fits their argument (in this case no evidence linking the Carcano to the blanket) they present it is bona fide gospel

Let's not bicker....  Let's simply face the FACTS....   The FBI Lab reported that there were NO blanket fibers on the carcano.

Can you explain how that could be possible if that rifle had been wrapped in that blanket  for two months

[Vincent Baxter]

Let's not bicker....  Let's simply face the FACTS....   The FBI Lab reported that there were NO blanket fibers on the carcano.

Can you explain how that could be possible if that rifle had been wrapped in that blanket  for two months

It could quite easily have been wrapped in something else before it was wrapped and hidden in the blanket in question.
I quite often double wrap things if I'm putting them away in storage, so its not exactly an absurd notion especially if it's an item that he probably didn't want discovered. In fact the more I think about it the more logical it would have been to have actually wrapped it in multiple layers.

More to the point, how would you explain the single blanket fibre the FBI found on the paper bag? It might be just a mere single fibre but do you not find it a bit strange that a fibre from a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage found turned up at the TSBD?

[Walt Cakebread]

It could quite easily have been wrapped in something else before it was wrapped and hidden in the blanket in question.
I quite often double wrap things if I'm putting them away in storage, so its not exactly an absurd notion especially if it's an item that he probably didn't want discovered. In fact the more I think about it the more logical it would have been to have actually wrapped it in multiple layers.

More to the point, how would you explain the single blanket fibre the FBI found on the paper bag? It might be just a mere single fibre but do you not find it a bit strange that a fibre from a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage found turned up at the TSBD?

Mr Baxter, You really need to study the case.....There are photos that show the blanket and the bag touching while lying on a table in the DPD on the evening of 11/22/63.....BEFORE the FBI examined the evidence.     

[how would you explain the single blanket fibre the FBI found on the paper bag? It might be just a mere single fibre but do you not find it a bit strange that a fibre from a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage found turned up at the TSBD?/quote]

[Bill Chapman]

It could quite easily have been wrapped in something else before it was wrapped and hidden in the blanket in question.
I quite often double wrap things if I'm putting them away in storage, so its not exactly an absurd notion especially if it's an item that he probably didn't want discovered. In fact the more I think about it the more logical it would have been to have actually wrapped it in multiple layers.

More to the point, how would you explain the single blanket fibre the FBI found on the paper bag? It might be just a mere single fibre but do you not find it a bit strange that a fibre from a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage found turned up at the TSBD?

Even one blanket fiber is sufficient to raise my eyebrows, I can tell you.

I can see it all now: 12 sets of juror eyebrows, snapping up in unison like Venetian blinds.. followed promptly by 12 palms slapping 12 foreheads.

[Vincent Baxter]

Could have, would have -- LOL

Michael Paine reported no crinkling.

Your idea is as dead now as it was 50 years ago.

So you're saying there is conclusive evidence that Oswald did NOT double wrap the rifle in anything other than that blanket in question?
Or are you just dismissing that because you choose to?

Most likely cross-contamination as already suggested.

EVIDENCE? EVIDENCE? (To quote your favourite response to practically every post on this forum).
Its funny how you insist that nothing anyone else says is fact unless there's hard evidence to prove it yet you're happy to conclude and dismiss anyone else's theory about the single fibre on the basis that it was "Most likely cross-contamination" of which you have no proof of.

Your ridiculous notion of demanding proof for everything works both ways so unless you can prove the fibre wasn't picked up from Ruth Paine's garage then it still raises considerable doubts

[Bill Chapman]

So you're saying there is conclusive evidence that Oswald did NOT double wrap the rifle in anything other than that blanket in question?
Or are you just dismissing that because you choose to?

EVIDENCE? EVIDENCE? (To quote your favourite response to practically every post on this forum).
Its funny how you insist that nothing anyone else says is fact unless there's hard evidence to prove it yet you're happy to conclude and dismiss anyone else's theory about the single fibre on the basis that it was "Most likely cross-contamination" of which you have no proof of.

Your ridiculous notion of demanding proof for everything works both ways so unless you can prove the fibre wasn't picked up from Ruth Paine's garage then it still raises considerable doubts

"The blanket is very well worn. Most of the nap has been worn off of it. It has had a lot of use, and much of the original composition has been worn off " Paul Stombaugh

"One would need a brand new blanket to get a good quantitative analysis." Paul Stombaugh

[Bill Chapman]

The amount of nonsense you're telling never stops.

Rather arrogant to insist that all 12 jurors would adopt your delusional view of the evidence.

BTW, face-palms would likely be seen once you're witnesses were cross-examined.

HA! You lot have been face-palming each other & tripping all over yourselves for 58 years in a mad dash to be first in line to kiss Oswald's arse.

Hahahahahahaha

[Bill Chapman]

Let's not bicker....  Let's simply face the FACTS....   The FBI Lab reported that there were NO blanket fibers on the carcano.

Can you explain how that could be possible if that rifle had been wrapped in that blanket  for two months

Stombaugh can and did:

"The blanket is very well worn. Most of the nap has been worn off of it. It has had a lot of use, and much of the original composition has been worn off " Paul Stombaugh

"One would need a brand new blanket to get a good quantitative analysis." Paul Stombaugh

Any hints in there for ya, thinker?