Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald

[Bill Chapman]

Except it wasn't exactly my "claim". Cakebread asked for an explanation as to how the rifle had no fibres from the blanket and I merely put forward a possible explanation. I wasn't saying it was FACT and that that was exactly what happened. It was a logical explanation that could have been the reason why though.
But because there is no hard evidence this happened (and more importantly because it doesn't fit in with your version of the events) you immediately disregard it and insist it's wrong.
Marina said the rifle was in the garage and that it was wrapped in the blanket but as far as I know she never stated it was wrapped in that blanket and that blanket alone. So how are you so certain that it wasn't double wrapped if there's no evidence to suggest otherwise?

So now you want us to take the FBI's conclusions as the final word?
The FBI also concluded that Oswald acted alone and yet you refuse to accept that.
Make up your mind.

"Whining"? Hahaha!
I don't recall any whining. This reminds me of your claim that Bill Chapman was having a rant when he clearly wasn't.
If you want to act all high and mighty and holier than thou you should maybe learn the definition of some of the words you're using before throwing accusations about.

But then of course its totally OK for you to make statements that aren't backed up by EVIDENCE or FACTS like your claim on this thread that Oswald was certain nobody else knew his address. Where's your evidence to back this statement up? No evidence clearly means your proclamation is wrong (or at least according to you it does).

I totally get it. I'm well aware there are so many unanswered questions to this case that currently has no evidence whatsoever to lead to a definite conclusion, and probably never will have. Thats the whole point of this forum; to discuss things like that.
You're happy to make unsupported statements in order to score a point in a petty argument (as we've just seen). You're happy to conveniently ignore a statement that may be unsupported by evidence when it fits your argument but as soon as someone suggests something otherwise you pipe up with the tiresome "EVIDENCE or didn't happen" demand.

I wouldn't mind if you even did it with wit or was an obvious troll just looking for a reaction on here but on the whole your posts are just so boring.

Because nobody has produced any evidence of Oswald taking a spombleprofglidnoctobuns during the last week of his life you'd argue that anyone who suggested that he must of done is obviously wrong.

Because nobody has produced any evidence of Oswald taking a spombleprofglidnoctobuns during the last week of his life you'd argue that anyone who suggested that he must of done is obviously wrong.
To which his OT* answer will be 'where did I say anything thing about Oswald taking a dump?

*Obvious Troll

[Bill Chapman]

2)  Stombaugh showed how that 'could be possible'.

You're trying too hard.

He 'showed' nothing in relation to the transfer of fibers.

You're wrong. His description of the blanket itself is self-explanatory regarding how the rifle could sit in the worn-down-to-the-nap blanket and not come in contact with any of the fibers found.

[Bill Chapman]

Well, once again you fail miserably -- ROFL

At what? Describing the nature of your shallow responses? BTW, it was your mancrush Oswald who failed miserably, Sluggo.

[Bill Chapman]

Dumping his best friend on the garage floor -- ROFL

Yep, and Oswald's only friend ever, who he so obviously died for. While you, Rolfie, throw yourself on the floor, rolling around laughing idiotically. Have you no self-respect? Oh, wait..

There's more: Too bad for you lot that your boy was seen shooting Tippit, rendering even just one blanket fiber in the gun bag as unassailably probative. Fancy that: The straw fiber that broke the camel's Oswald arse-kissers' backs.

[Bill Chapman]

Your prediction was false.

We have it on record.

Your knickers in a bunch.

Yet more meaningless drivel from yet another Oswald arse-kisser..

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Any chance the paper was dishevelled or torn slightly, enough to see the wood?
It makes sense to wrap the rifle with paper first; then wrap the threadbare blanket around it in a kind of Marine-indoctrination 'this is my rifle this is my gun' best-friend thing.

Full Metal Jacket

Yes, that makes sense. The wood stock/end of the rifle would stick out from the paper or not be completely covered by it. And it's why he made a new bag to completely cover it when he took it to work. The paper he was using exposed part of the rifle.

It also makes sense that he would wrap it in paper to protect any oil from leaking onto the blanket and floor and also prevent fibers from the blanket potentially clogging up firing mechanism/getting stuck.

In any case, the paper explanation certainly could explain the lack of fibers on it.

[Bill Chapman]

Wonderful to watch your desperation progress: he did, showed, self-explanatory.

Now you're stuck with the fibers in the bag.

Carry on.

English (or 'American' to you rednecks) isn't your first language, is it Herr Beck.  Here's some help:

Stombaugh

'Showed'
> Via his testimony

'Self-explanatory'
> Well.. not to the age 5 CTer reading-compression level apparently. Maybe I'll couch Stombaugh's blanket thing in a nursery rhyme. Assuming that you lot at least got as far as kindergarten, Herr Beck.

[Bill Chapman]

Ever heard of Occam's razor
This is how it works: The rifle was never in that blanket.

Ever heard of Lee Harvey Occam-Oswald?
See my brilliant 'How It Worked: The Nobody Who Shot the Somebody Had Help'
 
With, I might add, a foreward by former KGB Officer Tony Pranksetti which you can read if you can find the book.


BILL CHAPMAN

The nobody who shot the somebody had help:

1) Alek Hidell (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of armament procurement
2) O.H. Lee (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of safe-house procurement
3) Dirty Harvey (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of killing poor dumb cops

Dirty Harry
'Smith, Wesson... and me'
-----------------------------
Dirty Harvey
Smith, Wesson... and Lee


Alek Hidell (rhymes with Fidel) selective nutjob


Smith, Wesson... and Lee


O.H. Lee safe-house (no curtain rods needed)