Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald  (Read 23401 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #88 on: July 21, 2021, 06:00:08 PM »
Advertisement
Gyinyard, just to mention one.

It's all in the record.

Learn the case.

'Gyinyard' LOL
Learn how to spell. And edit.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #88 on: July 21, 2021, 06:00:08 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #89 on: July 21, 2021, 06:25:22 PM »
"you lot".

On record.

You're busted once again.

You're broken

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #90 on: July 21, 2021, 06:31:10 PM »
"Known Movements"

"Assumed Movements"

ROFL

Rolfie, Rolfie, Rolfie..

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #90 on: July 21, 2021, 06:31:10 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #91 on: July 21, 2021, 07:02:49 PM »
Guinyard & Callaway, right there on the map.

East sidewalk.

You have the measurements?

Not my map

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #92 on: July 22, 2021, 01:07:09 AM »
Testimonies?

Callaway > 55 measured feet
              > 2 Years college

Guinyard > 10 feet
              > grade 6

--------
BONUS
--------
OTBeck   > "race card"
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 02:05:58 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #92 on: July 22, 2021, 01:07:09 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #93 on: July 22, 2021, 05:15:46 AM »
No, I'm saying there is no evidence of Oswald double wrapping anything.

It's called burdon of proof.

Your claim, you back it up with evidence or STFU.

No, I dismissed that since you provided no supporting evidence

See above, it's call "burden of evidence".

Wouldn't you insist on hard evidence being presented if you were accused of murder?

...if not backed up with evidence.

The FBI concluded as they did and you refuse to accept.

I offered you a plausible explanation for your fibers and you start whining.

Maybe you should question why Montgomery has rammed his arm up the bag if it's evidence.

Raising doubts with you, so what?

Burden of prof is on you, I'm not obliged to prove anything to counter your unsupported claim.

I'm surprised you still don't get it.

'It's called burdon of proof'

LOL. Eric Burdon has something to prove?
Learn to spell. And edit.

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #94 on: July 22, 2021, 06:50:11 AM »
'It's called burdon of proof'

LOL. Eric Burdon has something to prove?
Learn to spell. And edit.

Yes, Burdon didn't want to be "misunderstood". :D


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #95 on: July 22, 2021, 07:32:24 AM »
Yes, Burdon didn't want to be "misunderstood". :D



Especially when his mother sewed his new blue jeans. And it must of been quite a burden for Burdon to live in the house the of rising sun. New Orleans is already friggin' hot enough. Not to mention the added burden of having a father who was a gamblin' man who was only satisfied when he was on a drunk.

'House of the Rising Sun' The Animals
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 07:56:36 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #95 on: July 22, 2021, 07:32:24 AM »