Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald

[Bill Chapman]

@ Oswald lovers

A post-in-the-life of an
'edit on-the-fly' writer

---------------------
BONUS EDITS FOR
HIGH SCHOOL
DROP OUTS 
---------------------
> bolded text for easier
reading (it's a graphic
designer thing)
1:42AM EST
> cropped page in the
interest of bandwidth
conservation (it's a web
site designer thing)
1:46AM EST
> checked spelling,
grammar & sentence
construction (its a
writer and graphic
designer thing)
2:03AM EST
> added 'skin' to 'colour'
re Guinyard and changed
'colour' to 'color' (English to
'American') for the education
deprived amongst us (aka CTers)
2:54AM EST
> accrued a number of time stamps,
which are a 'moveable feast'* (if you will)
amongst those who edit-on-the-fly.
(It's a professional writer thing)
OPEN-ENDED AM EST

*Cite Ernest Hemingway

[John Mytton]

You mean like Whaley ID'd Oswald by picking the wrong guy?

Sorry, no.

Mr. BALL. Did Whaley say anything to you personally?
Mr. LEAVELLE. To me personally?
Mr. BALL. Yes.
Mr. LEAVELLE. Well, of course, I asked him if he---if the man that he remembered or saw there, whatever he was identifying him for there was up there and he said "Yes, the man in the T-shirt." Whether he was doing all the talking or not wouldn't make any difference, he still knew him.



JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

OK, so let's consolidate the latest stupidity cranked out by Chapman.

'Based on nothing but school merits to get rid of Guinyard'.
> LOL! Guinyard ID'd Oswald, fool. No way would I 'get rid' of him

You mean like Whaley ID'd Oswald by picking the wrong guy?

Mr. BALL. Do you remember where he was standing in the lineup--what number he was?
Mr. GUINYARD. I don't know what his number was, but I can tell you where he was Standing at.
Mr. BALL. Where was he standing?
Mr. GUINYARD. He was standing--the second man from the east side, and that lineup was this way [indicating] and he was the second man from that there end.

'He testified to 10 feet under oath, no different from Callaway'
> Except that Callaway said 55 feet

So which was it?

'He even deliberately dropped (allegedly) evidence (shells) to be traced to his gun, ROFL'
> The Davis sisters also testified under oath, Rolfie.

But one of them lied.

Anyway, assuming shells were dropped makes your claim that Oswald was concerned with witnesses even more ridiculous.

How is that even supposed to make any sense, LOL
> Your grade8 is showing

So Chapman's school grade theory is "progressing" but still some blanks to fill in:

Grade6 ~ no good

Grade8 ~ no good

2 Years college ~ fine.

You post your nonsense and THEN try to fix it, otherwise the edits weren't time stamped
> I post YOUR nonsense and fix it, like your 'race card' denial.

Um, don't recall a denial but we can check your race obsession box by now.

That could have some truth to it considering how bad you are with the evidence.
> You lot keep claiming there's no evidence. Now there is? What took you so long?

Double your dose and try again.

Or, you simply made that up 'on the fly'.
> Keep guessing

A qualified guess considering how you make things up 'on the fly'.

'You're welcome, the information has only been out there for 50+ years.'
> I had no idea that Guinyard's skin color was that important to the assassination

Callaway was his boss, worth considering, especially given your race obsession.

(bandwidth conservation -- ROFL)

(professional writer thing -- ROFL)

Your Grade-8 is showing, Rolfie.

[Walt Cakebread]

You got that right, the CT's view on what happened on the 22nd is the epitome of "confusion".

This is getting very tedious, what this tells me is that;
 It's another example where evidence wasn't altered by the FBI/WC.
 That Callaway and Guinyard didn't fraudulently collaborate on their observations.
 That 5 months later Guinyard was a little confused about what side of the road, big deal!
 That the totality of the eyewitnesses all essentially agree with each other.

JohnM

the CT's view on what happened on the 22nd is the epitome of "confusion".

Pssst This will surely be a surprise to you.....But Ct's are NOT like LNer's.... CT's do not al sing in harmony....( in fact very few CT's sing from the same song book)...Unlike the simple minded LNer's who all sing the praises from their hymnal  ( The Warren Report)

So since the Ct's are not of one accord..... If you had a functioning brain you'd realize why they seem confused to you.....

[John Mytton]

the CT's view on what happened on the 22nd is the epitome of "confusion".

Pssst This will surely be a surprise to you.....But Ct's are NOT like LNer's.... CT's do not al sing in harmony....( in fact very few CT's sing from the same song book)...Unlike the simple minded LNer's who all sing the praises from their hymnal  ( The Warren Report)

So since the Ct's are not of one accord..... If you had a functioning brain you'd realize why they seem confused to you.....

But Ct's are NOT like LNer's....

No kidding, Sherlock.

CT's do not al sing in harmony....

Why not, it only happened one way.

Unlike the simple minded LNer's

Hang on, if you claim that CT's have a multitude of theories, shouldn't the "Oswald theory" which is actually based on the same evidence, simply be another theory that should be accepted?

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

@ Beck

So which was it?
> Must be 55 since according to you, SammyG couldn't ID him in the lineup

You mean like Whaley ID'd Oswald by picking the wrong guy?
> No, like Whaley saying Lee Harvey Oswald was the guy he hauled from the bus station

Anyway, assuming shells were dropped makes your claim that Oswald was concerned with witnesses even more ridiculous.
> Anyway, as with the Callaway scene, the comparison I'm making addresses Oswald's chances of postponing his inevitable capture. Oswald was in no danger of being accosted by Markham, the Davis sisters, a guy hiding in his truck nor another one hiding behind his cab @Tippit; versus @Callaway hollering at him which suggests a kind of fearlessness on the part of Callaway which could lead to some sort of confrontation if Oswald was on the same side of the street. Callaway was ex-Marine and might have jumped him if at close quarters.

So Chapman's school grade theory is "progressing" but still some blanks to fill in: Grade6 ~ no good.Grade8 ~ no good.2 Years college ~ fine
> Your obsession with your academic shortcomings is eating you up. Not my bad.

Um, don't recall a denial but we can check your race obsession box by now.
> Um, it was you who brought up the 'race card' in the first place and you are now trying to erase that fact. Shame on you.

A qualified guess considering how you make things up 'on the fly'
> YOU make things up. I EDIT 'on the fly'

bandwidth conservation -- ROFL
> Exactly, Rolfie
professional writer thing -- ROFL
> Exactly, Rolfie

[Walt Cakebread]

No kidding, Sherlock.

Why not, it only happened one way.

Hang on, if you claim that CT's have a multitude of theories, shouldn't the "Oswald theory" which is actually based on the same evidence, simply be another theory that should be accepted?

JohnM

CT's do not al sing in harmony....

Why not, it only happened one way.

Why Not???     CT's do not sing in harmony......  But they all recognize that the official US govt approved version is pure BS.....   LNer's aren't smart enough to use their tiny little brains and see that the WR is a pile of lies.....

[John Mytton]

CT's do not al sing in harmony....

Why not, it only happened one way.

Why Not???     CT's do not sing in harmony......  But they all recognize that the official US govt approved version is pure BS.....   LNer's aren't smart enough to use their tiny little brains and see that the WR is a pile of lies.....

CT's do not sing in harmony......  But they all recognize that the official US govt approved version is pure BS.....

Interesting, so in other words what's motivating Ct's has never been about the evidence but instead is some deeply ingrained paranoia of the Government. Got it!

JohnM