Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?  (Read 44912 times)

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5342
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2021, 11:09:03 PM »
Advertisement
Imagine that CTers have gone over this case to the extent that an apparent cotton ball in the ear of a cop has become a topic but they still can't construct any plausible alternative narrative that explains away the evidence against Oswald. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2021, 11:09:03 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #17 on: July 27, 2021, 12:24:06 AM »
Of all of these questions the two that are most striking to me are: "Why not plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza who say they saw Oswald shoot JFK?" and "Why not have Ruth Paine or Marina or Norman/Jarman/Williams more fully implicate Oswald in the shooting" Such as, he expressed hatred towards JFK, they saw him with a large package that morning, et cetera. Conspiracy believers say that there were all kinds of government agents or assets at the scene of the shooting. But none came forward and said they saw Oswald shoot from the window. Why not?

Hell, why not plant a note/letter from Oswald after Ruby shot him admitting guilt and giving his reasons, e.g., he hated the US, JFK was waging war on his hero Castro, et cetera? Oswald is dead. He can't refute it. One of the key points that Oswald defenders always raise is the question of motive. Well, here's the way to answer it.

If these powerful groups who were allegedly behind the assassination wanted to frame Oswald they could have done many more things to implicate him. But they didn't.

"Why not plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza who say they saw Oswald shoot JFK?"   

Answer .... Because Lee did not shoot JFK...... And if someone had swore they saw Lee shoot JFK and then someone like Marrion Baker ( for example) or some other person swore that he had seen LHO at a time when it made the witness statement obvious BS .....The police( if it had been a honest investigation)  would have called the witness and questioned  WHY they had reported something that they couldn't possibly have seen.....

You're not using your head......

The the number of people who knew of the plot to murder JFK had to be kept to a very small group.....The more people with knowledge of the plot, the greater the danger of the plot being discovered and foiled.   

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2021, 02:43:53 AM »
"Why not plant witnesses in Dealey Plaza who say they saw Oswald shoot JFK?"   

Answer .... Because Lee did not shoot JFK...... And if someone had swore they saw Lee shoot JFK and then someone like Marrion Baker ( for example) or some other person swore that he had seen LHO at a time when it made the witness statement obvious BS .....The police( if it had been a honest investigation)  would have called the witness and questioned  WHY they had reported something that they couldn't possibly have seen.....

You're not using your head......

The the number of people who knew of the plot to murder JFK had to be kept to a very small group.....The more people with knowledge of the plot, the greater the danger of the plot being discovered and foiled.   

Quote
The the number of people who knew of the plot to murder JFK had to be kept to a very small group.....

Huh?, In practically every one of your thousands of posts you seem to implicate someone new, for instance just in the above post you are already suggesting the Police hadn't been honest, exactly who else besides the Dallas Police was responsible and why? And if there was even one group beyond the Dallas Police, wouldn't that make a conspiracy that wasn't very small?

JohnM


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2021, 02:43:53 AM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #19 on: July 27, 2021, 04:16:54 AM »
I ask why no credible evidence of a conspiracy has been uncovered after all these years. And get treated to the absurd photo of what appears to be the outline of a flask of booze under the pants leg of one of the hobos! How paranoid do you have to be to believe that it looks like a walkie talkie?  ???
« Last Edit: July 27, 2021, 01:15:41 PM by Charles Collins »

Offline Robert Reeves

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #20 on: July 27, 2021, 08:10:15 AM »
It's interesting how suddenly now the cop has bad memory. Marvin Wise confirmed in his FBI statement the three tramps he escorted from the railtracks were released ... it appears ... IMMEDIATELY upon being taken in. No questioning, just released.




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #20 on: July 27, 2021, 08:10:15 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #21 on: July 27, 2021, 10:12:26 AM »
I told you before that Oswald was speaking in future tense, after Oswald ran into Baker and Truly on the 2nd floor Oswald made no secret that he went outside but if he was trying to create an alibi surely even you must agree he would have used past tense and explain "then I went outside and watched the P.Parade"

Besides we have Oswald himself on film no less, agreeing that he was inside which is totally corroborated by his interrogators.

Reporter:  "Were you in the building at the time?"
Oswald:  "Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir."


And please don't try on your absurd notion that the outside steps were somehow inside because the outside steps as described by his workmates were outside.

Mr. LOVELADY - That's on the second floor; so, I started going to the domino room where I generally went in to set down and eat and nobody was there and I happened to look on the outside and Mr. Shelley was standing outside with Miss Sarah Stanton, I believe her name is, and I said, "Well, I'll go out there and talk with them, sit down and eat my lunch out there, set on the steps," so I went out there.

Mr. BALL - You were standing where?
Mr. SHELLEY - Just outside the glass doors there.
Mr. BALL - That would be on the top landing of the entrance?
Mr. SHELLEY - yes.

Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; not right then I didn't. I say, you know, he was supposed to come by during our lunch hour so you don't get very many chances to see the President of the United States and being an old Texas boy, and [he] never having been down to Texas very much I went out there to see him and just like everybody else was, I was standing on the steps there and watched for the parade to come by and so I did and I stood there until he come by


Sarah Stanton who was on the steps described to the FBI that after hearing the shots "immediately went into the building".



JohnM

Tsk, tsk, Mr Mytton these weak copes of yours have already been dealt with multiple times....................

-Since 2019 the claim that Mr Oswald never placed himself outside for the motorcade is dead
-In the exchange with the reporter, Mr Oswald simply and snippily confirms that he was at his place of employment at the time of the shooting
-The enclosed, roofed front entrance steps are at once part of the building (not out on the street) and outside

So! I repeat my question: Why was Mr Oswald's claim in custody that he "went outside to watch P. Parade" suppressed in all the official interrogation reports?

 Thumb1:

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3854
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #22 on: July 27, 2021, 01:20:32 PM »
I don’t know what is going on with this website. It changes the word that can mean a container of booze to spombleprofglidnoctobuns in my previous post in this thread. And when I try to correct it that word keeps on being changed when I post it. Same thing in this post.

Now I am getting paranoid. What is going on?

Duncan, can you look into this please?

 ???


Edit: I guess since the word for the container of booze begins with an f and ends with a k that the software doesn’t let it display. Rather ridiculous I think.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2021, 04:23:11 PM by Charles Collins »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #23 on: July 27, 2021, 04:11:45 PM »
Huh?, In practically every one of your thousands of posts you seem to implicate someone new, for instance just in the above post you are already suggesting the Police hadn't been honest, exactly who else besides the Dallas Police was responsible and why? And if there was even one group beyond the Dallas Police, wouldn't that make a conspiracy that wasn't very small?

JohnM

In practically every one of your thousands of posts you seem to implicate someone new,

Huh??.....  You really are confused aren't you, Chum......  For years I've stood on my belief that Lyin Bastard Johnson, and J Edna Hoover are the pinnacle of the plot.     There's nobody new..... THEY CONTROLLED the "investigation"  ........  and orchestrated the tale presented to us in the Warren Report.   Some stupid, gutless, suckers  like yourself actually believe that mountain of BS, is the truth.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #23 on: July 27, 2021, 04:11:45 PM »