Does Hiding a Rifle You Plan On Leaving Anyway Really Make Sense?

[John Iacoletti]

It's reasonable proof for reasonable people to evaluate. You're not reasonable.

Speculation is not "reasonable proof".

[Richard Smith]

There is no ambiguity about the clipboard being discussed.  Kaiser confirms that Oswald was using the one he found on the 6th floor.  He knows it is the same one because he recognized it. 

Mr. BALL. And how was it you weren't using it on this day?
Mr. KAISER. You see, when he first started there
Mr. BALL. Who is "he"?
Mr. KAISER. Lee---when he first started to work there he got my clipboard and started using it.
Mr. BALL. Did you give it to him to use?
Mr. KAISER. No, he just picked it up and started using it and I just went and made me another one.
Mr. BALL. You recognized that clipboard when you saw it?
Mr. KAISER. Yes, because my name was all over it.

[John Iacoletti]

The old impossible standard of proof.  Absent a time machine, we couldn't prove any fact in human history if the standard is that we must somehow exclude EVERY other alternative possibility.  No matter how baseless or unsupported by facts and common sense.  You couldn't prove that Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg address if someone could raise doubt just by suggesting that it was possible that someone dressed up like Lincoln and delivered the speech.  It's possible after all.  No one can disprove it with absolute 100% certainty.

You can't even prove your faith-based narrative with 50% certainty.

[John Iacoletti]

There is no ambiguity about the clipboard being discussed.  Kaiser confirms that Oswald was using the one he found on the 6th floor.  He knows it is the same one because he recognized it. 

He knew Oswald used it because it had "Frankie Kaiser" all over it.

 

[Richard Smith]

HA HA HA. 

Translation: I can't deal with conflicting evidence.

So Kaiser was at work that day and lied about being at the dentist?

Possibly, the WC chose not to resolve the conflict in evidence.

Which of his coworkers saw him that day?  Do tell!

Which of his coworkers were asked if they saw him that day?  Do tell!

You are really losing it.

Two weeks of clipboard rants and you still have zero supporting evidence of "Oswald's clipboard" being found on the 6th floor so who's losing?

Looking forward to another week of of your "insights" and inside-Oswald's-head-psycho-babble!

Let us ponder the bizarre claim that there is somehow doubt as to whether Kaiser was working at the TSBD on 11.22.  Kaiser was asked by the WC whether he was at work on 11.22.  He confirmed that he was not there on 11.21 or 22.  He indicates that he was at another location the "Baylor Dental College" where he was undergoing treatment for a dental issue.  He volunteers that he watched JFK coverage with others in the lobby of the college.  So first we have to believe that Kaiser is lying about this point for some inexplicable reason and that he is not concerned that those who were present at the dental college would contradict his story.  Why he would lie about this is left to our imagination.  Now we also have to believe that he was lucky enough not to be seen in any pictures from that day at the TSBD, or that any of his coworkers would contradict his public testimony of not being there, and his name would not show up on any of the police reports or interviews of TSBD employees that were there that day.  Remarkable luck!  And all this risk and lying just to confirm that he found a clipboard!  HA HA HA.  You can't make that up.  But we are told that the issue is somehow in doubt.  It's possible.  If Kaiser is playing some nefarious role to frame Oswald and was present on 11.22, why doesn't provide something more incriminating than he found his clipboard some days later?  I'm sure an answer is forthcoming.  Right?

[John Iacoletti]

Did anyone at Baylor Dental College corroborate his story?  Or is corroboration only needed when "Richard" doesn't believe something?

[Zeon Mason]

Is it just coincidental that the only boxes in the wall of boxes that are open with flaps up and much of the contents of the boxes removed, are the 3 boxes exactly where the rifle is laying on the floor?

[Jerry Organ]

Is it just coincidental that the only boxes in the wall of boxes that are open with flaps up and much of the contents of the boxes removed, are the 3 boxes exactly where the rifle is laying on the floor?

Many boxes that was accessible were left open (maybe items often needed).