Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear  (Read 16343 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2021, 07:52:15 PM »
Advertisement
So, are you admitting that you believe it was LHO who made the attempt on Walker’s life?


What solid proof do you have that PROVES an attempt was made to kill Walker?   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2021, 07:52:15 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2021, 09:31:47 PM »
Fair enough.

I wasn't aware you had unchecked the Walker box.

Most Nutters buy the whole Warren cover-up package of lies and deception.

Where did you get the idea that I had unchecked the Walker box?

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2021, 10:19:24 PM »
Fair enough.

I wasn't aware you had unchecked the Walker box.

Most Nutters buy the whole Warren cover-up package of lies and deception.

Most LNers think the first shot (most believe it to be a miss) occurred before a point in the Zapruder film much earlier than that suggested by the Warren Commission. There's also some confidence in the SBT occurring in the early-Z220s, something the Commission didn't argue. The Odio Sisters claim and Ruby at Parkland are considered by some LNers as plausible.

Beyond the Commission, most LNers believe the more-refined ballistics analysis and 3D recreation confirm the SBT and head shot. The work of the HSCA and Professor Hany Farid proved the Backyard Photos were authentic.

What do the CTs have? Public opinion based on most people not examining the case. Photos of varying resolution and time intervals that "show" two different Lees, Marguerites and Babushka Ladies. Ruby lookalike shooting Oswald. Greer shooting Kennedy. Vicki Adams doing Olympic-style sprinting in three-inch heels. Endless semantics about clipboards, the lunchroom encounter and the Man in the Doorway. Being the laughingstock of the Internet.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2021, 10:19:24 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2021, 12:19:58 AM »
Wasn't the Walker bullet steel jacketed?

Mr. EISENBERG - Can you think of any reason why someone might have called this a steel-jacketed bullet?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; except that some individuals commonly refer to rifle bullets as steel-jacketed bullets, when they actually in fact just have a copper-alloy jacket.


 Thumb1:

JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2021, 12:27:55 AM »
Most LNers think the first shot (most believe it to be a miss) occurred before a point in the Zapruder film much earlier than that suggested by the Warren Commission. There's also some confidence in the SBT occurring in the early-Z220s, something the Commission didn't argue. The Odio Sisters claim and Ruby at Parkland are considered by some LNers as plausible.

Beyond the Commission, most LNers believe the more-refined ballistics analysis and 3D recreation confirm the SBT and head shot. The work of the HSCA and Professor Hany Farid proved the Backyard Photos were authentic.

What do the CTs have? Public opinion based on most people not examining the case. Photos of varying resolution and time intervals that "show" two different Lees, Marguerites and Babushka Ladies. Ruby lookalike shooting Oswald. Greer shooting Kennedy. Vicki Adams doing Olympic-style sprinting in three-inch heels. Endless semantics about clipboards, the lunchroom encounter and the Man in the Doorway. Being the laughingstock of the Internet.

Yep, that sums it up, the WC/HSCA supporters endorse science and deductive reasoning whereas the CT's believe in Voodoo and extreme paranoia.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2021, 12:27:55 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2021, 01:00:16 AM »

What solid proof do you have that PROVES an attempt was made to kill Walker?

The same camera that took Oswald family photos and the backyard photos also took multiple photos of the Walker residence about a month before the attempted assassination.





In Oswald's possession was a bus map that had large cross on Walkers house.



At about the same time Oswald penned a letter to Marina in what to do after Oswald was captured.





The window frame that deflected the Walker bullet.



JohnM
« Last Edit: August 06, 2021, 01:05:57 AM by John Mytton »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2021, 06:29:41 AM »
Mr. EISENBERG - Can you think of any reason why someone might have called this a steel-jacketed bullet?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; except that some individuals commonly refer to rifle bullets as steel-jacketed bullets, when they actually in fact just have a copper-alloy jacket.


LOL.  Who are these individuals who commonly do this?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2021, 06:30:52 AM »
The same camera that took Oswald family photos and the backyard photos also took multiple photos of the Walker residence about a month before the attempted assassination.

Great - convict the camera then.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2021, 06:30:52 AM »