The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear

[Bill Chapman]

More odd...... none of the drawings depict the scene that Mooney saw when he first entered that cubby hole ....

The boxes were not placed as Mr Organ shows them.....  Very deceptive and dishonest.

Hey Oddwalt, put up the images that depict Mooney's description.

[Bill Chapman]

Odd that none of your fancy diagrams actually show the perspective from the shooter out the window towards the street

Ah, yet another Odd-wald arse kisser revealed.

[Bill Chapman]

Why would that be odd?

Yeah, I'd love to see what Ten-Watt is getting at. The 3D reconstruction is based on the two Crime Scene Photos taken before the boxes were moved. There's loads of clearance between the top of Box A and the raised window sill.

I can't wait for one of these amateur dim-bulbs to put up their own 'diagrams' of the scene... like Ernie who had naked guys in the limo and effeminate shooters in tights.

[Walt Cakebread]

Why would that be odd?

Yeah, I'd love to see what Ten-Watt is getting at. The 3D reconstruction is based on the two Crime Scene Photos taken before the boxes were moved. There's loads of clearance between the top of Box A and the raised window sill.

When Mooney first entered the cubby hole there were three rolling readers boxes stacked three feet high, immediately behind the window ( there are many photos that show the boxes stacked there. and the shadows in the photo and the scene in Dealey Plaza outside are a time stamp showing the time to be about 1:15 )....   There was no box on the window sill at that time.....

Now,  since your drawing indicates that the center of the butt was 29 inches from the floor and the boxes were stacked 36 inches high.....The barrel would have been ELEVATED..... not declined toward Elm street .....

And as a side note.....Howard Brennan stated that the man he saw with a rifle was STANDING.....    So why don't you use an eyewitnesses sworn affidavit rather than some imaginary depiction???

[Matt Grantham]

Why would that be odd?

 Why would not including the actual perspective of the shooter not be odd?

[Walt Cakebread]

Because the post I was responding to was wondering how someone could fit behind the boxes, which the graphic addresses.

Should every graphic concerning the JFK assassination have a sniper's view of the head shot?

No The question was NOT whether someone could fit behind the boxes......The question is.....How could a 5'9" man sit on a box to the rear of the three foot tall stack of Rolling Readers (Sitting 5'9" man's shoulder about three feet from the floor)

Thus the rifle would actually be aimed UP...NOT declined toward Elm Street....

[Bill Chapman]

Oswald did not shoot while seated on the box away from the window: He had to be right at the window in order to be seen from the street by Brennan & Euins while taking a knee and firing downrange.

Images are from Stephen King's '11.22.63'
Oswald is played by Daniel Webber


Oswald awaits the motorcade


Oswald reacts to motorcade arrival at Houston

 
Oswald takes a knee and tracks Kennedy at SN window

[Walt Cakebread]

Oswald did not shoot while seated on the box away from the window: He had to be right at the window in order to be seen from the street by Brennan & Euins while taking a knee and firing downrange.

Images are from Stephen King's '11.22.63'
Oswald is played by Daniel Webber

 
Oswald awaits the motorcade


Oswald reacts to motorcade arrival at Houston

 
Oswald takes a knee and tracks Kennedy at SN window

Oswald takes a knee and tracks Kennedy at SN window

You simply can't be honest can you Crapman?......    Brennan swore that the man he saw aiming a rifle out of a 6th floor window was STANDING at the time and bracing the rifle against the side of the window....  He was NOT kneeling.....And further more Brennan said that the man was dressed in light colored clothing possibly khaki.....Lee was wearing DARK colored clothes ( (Brown shirt and dark gray trousers) and Lee didn't even own any clothes like the clothes described by Brennan....