Oswald just happened to have a Carcano rifle and it just happened to have a couple of notches that sorta' resembled the ones on the rifle recovered from the sniper's nest. But, no, they were different. "It doesn't look the same". The experts were wrong. Because "LOL."
Sure, maybe they were wrong. But just dismissing it with the juvenile "LOL" isn't showing it.
Poor Oswald. He just decided to leave his money to Marina that day, he just decided to leave his wedding ring, he just decided to bring curtain rods to work, he just decided to leave the building shortly after the assassination, he just decided to go see a move and not watch the TV, he just decided, he just decided, he just decided, he just decided.....
Lots of people "just decide" to do things like that and Oswald was just like lots of other people. Except Oswald was not like lots of people (he defected to the USSR for example) and he did all of those things not some of them.
Oswald just happened to have a Carcano rifle and it just happened to have a couple of notches that sorta' resembled the ones on the rifle recovered from the sniper's nest. But, no, they were different. "It doesn't look the same". The experts were wrong. Because "LOL."
Sure, maybe they were wrong. But just dismissing it with the juvenile "LOL" isn't showing it.
Yeah, the overuse of "LOL" when something isn't even remotely funny has greatly diminished the impact that the acronym originally had and now being used as a cheap gag when they have no other answer is simply a product of a juvenile mind that's run out of ideas.
Poor Oswald. He just decided to leave his money to Marina that day, he just decided to leave his wedding ring, he just decided to bring curtain rods to work, he just decided to leave the building shortly after the assassination, he just decided to go see a move and not watch the TV, he just decided, he just decided, he just decided, he just decided.....
CT's have dug deep into Oswald's life and keep implying that Oswald had no motive and isn't on record as hating JFK therefore he must be innocent but will still dismiss the very basics that you have just outlined, they will isolate each example and for instance say "Left his wedding ring LOL" but when examined as a collective he symbolically left his wedding ring in Marina's family tea cup, spendthrift Oswald left almost all his money with Marina, he takes a long package to work and claims to a work mate that they are curtain rods, Oswald's rifle LOL was found on the 6th floor with still no alternate explanation on how it got there?
And why the heck would Oswald who needed his job and didn't have permission to leave the building, leave within the time it took to reach the front door?, of course the CT will say that others left too but they weren't inside at the time and some like Givens couldn't get back in, and the workers who were finally dismissed only left after some time had passed but none of them owned the rifle that killed the President and none of them were positively identified as killing Tippit and none of them were hiding in the darkened Texas Theatre miles away.
The fact that Oswald didn't seem to be curious in any way about what was happening directly outside his workplace and only wanted to get as far away as possible as soon as he could is a classic example of flight from the scene of a crime, yet CT's for some reason don't want to acknowledge the bleeding obvious.
JohnM