Howard Brennan, the unwrinkled bus transfer, Dallas Transit owner Harry Weinberg

[Tom Scully]

Meanwhile back to the bus.....why would someone walk 6 or 7 blocks while observing obviously stalled traffic... board this particular bus and then get off because it's not going anywhere?

Since RD Matthews' aunt, Adelaide Seuter Germany, was married and had a son with Mary Bledsoe's uncle, Jewell
R Germany, and Mary was such a dubious witness,
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,771.msg25998.html#msg25998
along with her son, Porter Bledsoe, who allegedly made $4 selling the calendar
evidence supporting an recent Oswald/Bledsoe relationship, and bus driver McWatters likely mistook his passenger,
Roy Milton Jones for an allegedly irrationally present Oswald, the only solid evidence is the bus transfer.

RD Matthews HSCA file
https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol9/pdf/HSCA_Vol9_5Fvii_Matthews.pdf

If it is reasonable to expect jailers to screen carefully an incoming arrestee accused of killing a cop in the recent
90 minutes, it is reasonable to expect a bus transfer, live revolver rounds, no more often than a razor blade, would have escaped the intake/booking stage search regimen of the Dallas City jailers.

[John Mytton]

Meanwhile back to the bus.....why would someone walk 6 or 7 blocks while observing obviously stalled traffic... board this particular bus and then get off because it's not going anywhere?

Before you jump the gun, please first explain why Oswald who already had trouble finding a job and only got the TSBD job because he lied, left the building within 3 minutes of the assassination?

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

 

Before you jump the gun, please first explain why Oswald who already had trouble finding a job and only got the TSBD job because he lied, left the building within 3 minutes of the assassination?

JohnM

'jump the gun'

Good one... a perfect description of Iacoletti, who seems to have a need to try the case separately, on every single tree, while ignoring the forest. CTers conveniently ignore the fact that cases cannot be tried piecemeal; they need to be tried on the accumulated evidence.

I have high confidence that a reasonable person can see that the accumulated circumstantial  evidence would be worthy of being accepted as such at trial. It has been shown to my satisfaction that these many pieces regarding, for example, Oswald's first-time-ever actions (in several incidences) that day amount to more than mere coincidence.

[Martin Weidmann]

'jump the gun'

Good one... a perfect description of Iacoletti, who seems to have a need to try the case separately, on every single tree, while ignoring the forest. CTers conveniently ignore the fact that cases cannot be tried piecemeal; they need to be tried on the accumulated evidence.

I have high confidence that a reasonable person can see that the accumulated circumstantial  evidence would be worthy of being accepted as such at trial. It has been shown to my satisfaction that these many pieces regarding, for example, Oswald's first-time-ever actions (in several incidences) that day amount to more than mere coincidence.

A house burns down and the owner of the house, who is only two blocks away and is a heavy smoker, just happens to have a lighter on him.... now isn't that a coincidence?

[John Mytton]

A house burns down and the owner of the house, who is only two blocks away and is a heavy smoker, just happens to have a lighter on him.... now isn't that a coincidence?

That's interesting?

Was the man observed carrying into his neighbours house a lighter sized packag which he later lied about?
Was the lighter found in the house with the mans prints and matching shirt fibers?
Did the man have no alibi?
Were the mans prints found were the ignition started?
Was the man seen leaving just minutes later?
Did the man get on a bus then get off a bus then catch a taxi?
Did the man get out of the taxi wayyy past his house?
Was the man observed killing a cop?
Did the man resist arrest and try and kill another cop?

JohnM

[Richard Smith]

No one kook has ever explained why the conspirators would go to such great pains and risk to create a fake scenario that puts Oswald on a bus that goes nowhere.  If it had taken him to his boardinghouse and was being used to cover up some other movement like one of the conspirators driving him there, that would be one thing (but open up the question as to why the conspirators would assist or care about what Oswald does in the aftermath of the assassination).  But it didn't.  It is silly and improbable in any planned narrative context to create a fake scenario that does nothing to advance the plot.  Oswald was on the bus to nowhere.   The transfer proves it beyond any doubt.

[Walt Cakebread]

No one kook has ever explained why the conspirators would go to such great pains and risk to create a fake scenario that puts Oswald on a bus that goes nowhere.  If it had taken him to his boardinghouse and was being used to cover up some other movement like one of the conspirators driving him there, that would be one thing (but open up the question as to why the conspirators would assist or care about what Oswald does in the aftermath of the assassination).  But it didn't.  It is silly and improbable in any planned narrative context to create a fake scenario that does nothing to advance the plot.  Oswald was on the bus to nowhere.   The transfer proves it beyond any doubt.

The transfer proves it beyond any doubt.

It does??   Perhaps a simple mind wouldn't question the evidential value that bus trans ......

[John Iacoletti]

Before you jump the gun, please first explain why Oswald who already had trouble finding a job and only got the TSBD job because he lied,

I'll bite.  What on his job application is a lie?

left the building within 3 minutes of the assassination?

Like you know when he left the building.