Howard Brennan, the unwrinkled bus transfer, Dallas Transit owner Harry Weinberg

[John Mytton]

Like you know when he left the building.

Try to keep up John, events don't happen in a vacuum, Oswald walked/ran up Elm street, Oswald caught a bus, Oswald got off the bus, Oswald walked/ran to the cab stand, Oswald traveled wayyy past his rooming house, Oswald was seen about 1PM by the housekeeper.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Good one... a perfect description of Iacoletti, who seems to have a need to try the case separately, on every single tree, while ignoring the forest. CTers conveniently ignore the fact that cases cannot be tried piecemeal; they need to be tried on the accumulated evidence.

Says the guy who has yet to cite a single piece of evidence.

I have high confidence that a reasonable person can see that the accumulated circumstantial  evidence would be worthy of being accepted as such at trial.

Of course you do.  Everybody think his own opinion is the most reasonable.

It has been shown to my satisfaction that these many pieces regarding, for example, Oswald's first-time-ever actions (in several incidences) that day amount to more than mere coincidence.

Really.  Specify these "first-time-ever" actions and describe how they mean "murdered the president".  We already have the wedding ring.  What else?

[John Iacoletti]

That's interesting?

Was the man observed carrying into his neighbours house a lighter sized packag which he later lied about?
Was the lighter found in the house with the mans prints and matching shirt fibers?
Did the man have no alibi?
Were the mans prints found were the ignition started?
Was the man seen leaving just minutes later?
Did the man get on a bus then get off a bus then catch a taxi?
Did the man get out of the taxi wayyy past his house?
Was the man observed killing a cop?
Did the man resist arrest and try and kill another cop?

Too bad most of these things don't apply to Oswald either.

[John Mytton]

Too bad most of these things don't apply to Oswald either.

You said yourself John, that all the evidence points to Oswald.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

No one kook has ever explained why the conspirators would go to such great pains and risk to create a fake scenario that puts Oswald on a bus that goes nowhere.  If it had taken him to his boardinghouse and was being used to cover up some other movement like one of the conspirators driving him there, that would be one thing (but open up the question as to why the conspirators would assist or care about what Oswald does in the aftermath of the assassination).  But it didn't.  It is silly and improbable in any planned narrative context to create a fake scenario that does nothing to advance the plot.  Oswald was on the bus to nowhere.   The transfer proves it beyond any doubt.

How about "Richard" explaining what being on a bus has to do with who killed the president?

[John Iacoletti]

Try to keep up John, events don't happen in a vacuum, Oswald walked/ran up Elm street, Oswald caught a bus, Oswald got off the bus, Oswald walked/ran to the cab stand, Oswald traveled wayyy past his rooming house, Oswald was seen about 1PM by the housekeeper.  Do the Math!

Let's see.  The actual evidence shows that the bus driver confused Roy Milton Jones for Oswald, Bledsoe's only evidence that Oswald was ever one of her tenants was "sold by her son", and Whaley picked up his passenger at 12:30.  How about you do the math?

[John Iacoletti]

You said yourself John, that all the evidence points to Oswald.

Dishonestly quoting somebody out of context is just another lie by omission.  As usual, you should be ashamed.

What little evidence there is, is weak, circumstantial, and tainted.

[John Mytton]

How about "Richard" explaining what being on a bus has to do with who killed the president?

Are you joking, Oswald's frenzied flight from the scene of the crime is classic consciousness of guilt.



JohnM