Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Howard Brennan, the unwrinkled bus transfer, Dallas Transit owner Harry Weinberg  (Read 41941 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Advertisement
Dishonestly quoting somebody out of context is just another lie by omission.  As usual, you should be ashamed.

What little evidence there is, is weak, circumstantial, and tainted.

Well Johnny boy I wasn't the only one, your initial post on the subject was also noted by Caprio and your argument and subsequent weak attempt to defend yourself from the above comment went on for weeks.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
A house burns down and the owner of the house, who is only two blocks away and is a heavy smoker, just happens to have a lighter on him.... now isn't that a coincidence?

To be fair, you'll have to extend the number of houses that burn down with your smoker standing near, in order to stack up numerically with the actions that Oswald took?for the first time ever?during those last couple of days.

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1216
No one kook has ever explained why the conspirators would go to such great pains and risk to create a fake scenario that puts Oswald on a bus that goes nowhere.  If it had taken him to his boardinghouse and was being used to cover up some other movement like one of the conspirators driving him there, that would be one thing (but open up the question as to why the conspirators would assist or care about what Oswald does in the aftermath of the assassination).  But it didn't.  It is silly and improbable in any planned narrative context to create a fake scenario that does nothing to advance the plot.  Oswald was on the bus to nowhere.   The transfer proves it beyond any doubt.

If all was as hunky dory as your deliberate incuriousity influences you to present .... Oswald = LN assassin, why
are a suprising number of things going unanswered, out of kilter? I am sorry if examples such as this do not occur to
you or cause you any concern.

Is this a matter of fact description accurately and relevently presenting John Connally family background,
considering Bobby Hale testified he attempted to slap away from Connally's daughter's head, the 20 ga. shotgun barrell
Bobby testified his wife Kathleen Connally Hale was encountered by him, aiming at her own head, just as she was pulling the trigger of?
And a WC exhibit reports Bobby's mother Virginia Hale of Fortune Rd., Fort Worth, and the Texas State Employment office as
contacting Oswald in 1962 to advise him of a job opening at Leslie Welding. May 13, 1964: https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1389.pdf

And a 1962 FBI Los Angeles stakeout report described Bobby Hale and his twin brother forcing illegal entry into the apartment of Judith Exner and soon driving away in a Chevy Corvette with a Texas plate assigned to their father, director of security at General Dynamics and a former FBI agent.


Quote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Connally
....Personal Details.....Children   4
.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Connally#Early_life_and_education
.....Connally was born on February 27, 1917, into a large family in Floresville, the seat of Wilson County southeast of San Antonio. He was one of seven children....[1] His six siblings included four brothers: Golfrey, Merrill, Wayne, and Stanford Connally and sisters Carmen and Blanche.[2]
..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Connally#Later_years
....Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, for whom Connally's daughter had been employed in the state treasurer's office, won the seat by a wide margin....

The example wiki bio page was edited to remove any of the controversies I described above it.

Your demeanor and the sanitized article example are artificial constructs. One reliable result is they are both unreasonable
reactions, flying in the face of facts. At least some of the "kooks" are sincere, reasonable, honest people.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2018, 11:37:20 PM by Tom Scully »

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Are you joking, Oswald's frenzied flight from the scene of the crime is classic consciousness of guilt.

Bugliosi rhetoric, right on cue.

"Frenzied".  LOL.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Well Johnny boy I wasn't the only one, your initial post on the subject was also noted by Caprio and your argument and subsequent weak attempt to defend yourself from the above comment went on for weeks.

Sure, "Mytton".  What does that have to do with you dishonestly quoting me out of context?

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Sure, "Mytton".  What does that have to do with you dishonestly quoting me out of context?

The whole point that you conveniently ignored is that your initial post couldn't have been very clear if Caprio came to the same conclusion as me and Caprio like a dog with a bone gave you a right chewing out.

JohnM

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
The whole point that you conveniently ignored is that your initial post couldn't have been very clear if Caprio came to the same conclusion as me and Caprio like a dog with a bone gave you a right chewing out.

Funny that Caprio is suddenly your best buddy now after the way you've treated him.

You've demonstrated time and time again that you misrepresent what people say just like you misrepresent the evidence.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Funny that Caprio is suddenly your best buddy now after the way you've treated him.

Another Iacoletti deception, where did I say or even imply that Caprio was my "best buddy"?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum