There may well be a person called Darryl/Darrel Glick.
But they have nothing to do with this case. If you have solid evidence otherwise please present it or I'll have to assume it's something you've made up/seriously misunderstood (Reply # 191)
My bad Walt.
That means not a single CTer has been able to provide a plausible explanation for Oswald's movements after leaving the TSBD.
Not a single one.
"Whaley left the Greyhound bus depot with his passenger about 15 minutes before Lee Oswald could have arrived at the bus depot taxi stand."
This is not a fact.
It's your interpretation of Whaley's manifest from which you take his rounded off, estimated times as actual times.
"Whaley said that his passenger was wearing a BLUE JACKET and BLUE trousers."
This is not a fact.
Nowhere does Whaley state Oswald was wearing a blue jacket.
The fact is that the only colour Whaley applies to the jacket is grey.
Just do what everyone else does - snipe at the inconsistencies in the case whilst offering no other solution and carry on waving the flag of "Truth".
The testimony of William Whaley.....
Mr. BALL. Did you notice how he was dressed?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir. I didn’t pay much attention to it right then. But it
all came back when I really found out who I had. He was dressed in just
ordinary work clothes.
It wasn’t khaki pants but they were khaki material,
blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki. Then he had on a
brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it and he had on some kind
of jacket, I didn’t notice very close hut I think it was a work jacket that
almost matched the pants.
"Whaley said that his passenger was wearing a BLUE JACKET and BLUE trousers."This is not a fact.
Nowhere does Whaley state
Oswald that his passenger was wearing a blue jacket.
Whaley... "it wasn’t khaki pants but they were khaki material,
blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki.
Whaley....."I think it was a work
jacket that almost matched the pants."
