Why are the CT's so obsessed with disproving the innocent Bus and Cab rides?

[Dan O'meara]

Why don't you say "FBI experts", you know the same FBI experts that Hoover was in charge of and that is the same Hoover that you are on record as being behind the assassination? Hahaha!
Btw the evidence that Cadigan gave isn't exactly what you claim.

Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Cadigan, can you state your full name and position?
Mr. CADIGAN. James C. Cadigan, special agent of the FBI, assigned as an examiner of questioned documents in the laboratory here in Washington.

Mr. DULLES. Would the scratches indicate there was a hard object inside the bag, as distinct from a soft object that would make no abrasions or scratches?
Mr. CADIGAN. Well, if you were to characterize it that way, yes. I mean there were a few scratches here. What caused them, I can't say. A hard object; yes. Whether that hard object was part of a gun----
Mr. DULLES. I understand.

The size of Oswald's paper sack that was found in Oswald's sniper's nest is the right size to carry Oswald's broken down rifle, another Oswald coincidence?







JohnM

I've seen the photo of the SN with the paper bag on top of it before but never thought to ask - when was that photo taken?

[Gerry Down]

That appears to be the bag on top of those boxes. Same creases and all.

So the bag was pictured in the snipers nest, albeit after someone moved it from the floor, probably not realizing at the time it was related to the shooting. They probably just thought it was a scrap piece of paper.

[John Mytton]

That appears to be the bag on top of those boxes. Same creases and all.

So the bag was pictured in the snipers nest, albeit after someone moved it from the floor, probably not realizing at the time it was related to the shooting. They probably just thought it was a scrap piece of paper.

It definitely has to be the same bag and this photo only captured it by accident but as you say the bag must have initially been considered insignificant and was inadvertantly moved. The CT's have got a lot of mileage out of the bag not being photographed in its original position but as this photo shows the bag which was the right size for Oswald's broken down rifle and also contained Oswald's prints was definitely within the sniper's nest.

JohnM

[Walt Cakebread]

That appears to be the bag on top of those boxes. Same creases and all.

So the bag was pictured in the snipers nest, albeit after someone moved it from the floor, probably not realizing at the time it was related to the shooting. They probably just thought it was a scrap piece of paper.

They probably just thought it was a scrap piece of paper.

And they would have assumed correctly.....BTW..... What is the time and date that the photo was taken?  Who took the photo?

[Alan Ford]

It definitely has to be the same bag and this photo only captured it by accident but as you say the bag must have initially been considered insignificant and was inadvertantly moved. The CT's have got a lot of mileage out of the bag not being photographed in its original position but as this photo shows the bag which was the right size for Oswald's broken down rifle and also contained Oswald's prints was definitely within the sniper's nest.

JohnM

Question!

What's holding this bag up?

[Alan Ford]

Question!

What's holding this bag up?

Perhaps not wholly unrelated document!

[Alan Ford]

Sensible Conclusion!

This bag was made that afternoon from the first-floor wrapping table in order to have something to place the wooden strip from the window into



The important piece of evidence in Det. Montgomery's hand is not the bag but what the bag contains

 

[Alan Ford]

Meanwhile, of course...................