Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald: No power lunch  (Read 86884 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #120 on: August 31, 2021, 03:11:50 PM »
Advertisement
Well, it would depend on the size of the "fairly good-sized package", no?

Let us put the likely case: Mr Shelley saw a fairly good-sized package of the same size as that described by Mr Buell Wesley Frazier, i.e. one not large enough to hold a rifle.

Would his volunteering of this information be apt to be met by the 'investigating' authorities with
a) calm appreciation towards Mr Shelley for having helped them with their investigation?
b) panic?

Answers on a postcard, please!  Thumb1:


BILL CHAPMAN

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #120 on: August 31, 2021, 03:11:50 PM »


Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #121 on: August 31, 2021, 03:12:30 PM »
I see, you are a legend in your own mind.... Got it  :D
I have made say 300 postings.
Read them, & learn.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #122 on: August 31, 2021, 05:24:42 PM »
I have made say 300 postings.
Read them, & learn.

I have made say 300 postings.

That's 299 too many.....  None of them provide any useful information....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #122 on: August 31, 2021, 05:24:42 PM »


Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #123 on: August 31, 2021, 11:48:36 PM »
I have made say 300 postings.

That's 299 too many.....  None of them provide any useful information....
Some of my early postings are wrong (but i was learning fast), but the later ones are ok (in fact brilliant).
Most comments are in 13 threads started by myself, & some (mostly early ones) are on approx 10 threads started by others.  My comments draw attention to.....
Hughes footage (missed by others) showing Rackley (walking towards the TSBD) & Romack (watching Rackley) before the first shot.
Bell's footage (missed by others) showing Hoffman's falcon (stopping on the overpass, as JFK passes under) & Officer Murphy (firstly on the nearside of the overpass, as JFK passes under)(& then on the far side, after JFK has passed).
Bronson's footage (mostly missed by others) showing agent Hickey with AR15 (AR15 swinging upwards at approx Z318), & showing various reactions by other agents in QM.
Muchmore's footage (missed by others) showing driver Kinney's headturn reaction at approx Z320.
Zapruder's footage (mostly missed by others) showing Brennan's head/eye movements Z133 to Z207.
In addition i explain/theorize re -- Oswald's movements during his exit from the TSBD -- & Brennan's movements during the shots (he ducks down behind the solid concrete pillar at approx Z313).
I show a picture of the bullet hole in the floor of the JFK limo (hole made by Oswald's first shot, that missed JFK).
« Last Edit: August 31, 2021, 11:50:08 PM by Marjan Rynkiewicz »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #124 on: September 01, 2021, 12:38:00 AM »
Some of my early postings are wrong (but i was learning fast), but the later ones are ok (in fact brilliant).
Most comments are in 13 threads started by myself, & some (mostly early ones) are on approx 10 threads started by others.  My comments draw attention to.....
Hughes footage (missed by others) showing Rackley (walking towards the TSBD) & Romack (watching Rackley) before the first shot.
Bell's footage (missed by others) showing Hoffman's falcon (stopping on the overpass, as JFK passes under) & Officer Murphy (firstly on the nearside of the overpass, as JFK passes under)(& then on the far side, after JFK has passed).
Bronson's footage (mostly missed by others) showing agent Hickey with AR15 (AR15 swinging upwards at approx Z318), & showing various reactions by other agents in QM.
Muchmore's footage (missed by others) showing driver Kinney's headturn reaction at approx Z320.
Zapruder's footage (mostly missed by others) showing Brennan's head/eye movements Z133 to Z207.
In addition i explain/theorize re -- Oswald's movements during his exit from the TSBD -- & Brennan's movements during the shots (he ducks down behind the solid concrete pillar at approx Z313).
I show a picture of the bullet hole in the floor of the JFK limo (hole made by Oswald's first shot, that missed JFK).

Bronson's footage (mostly missed by others) showing agent Hickey with AR15 (AR15 swinging upwards at approx Z318), & showing various reactions by other agents in QM.

As I recall this was one of your early posts....You proposed the idea hat Hickey had shot JFK.....Utterly ridiculous!!   After that I avoided your posts....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #124 on: September 01, 2021, 12:38:00 AM »


Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #125 on: September 01, 2021, 12:51:43 AM »
Bronson's footage (mostly missed by others) showing agent Hickey with AR15 (AR15 swinging upwards at approx Z318), & showing various reactions by other agents in QM.

As I recall this was one of your early posts....You proposed the idea that Hickey had shot JFK.....Utterly ridiculous!!   After that I avoided your posts....
U should read my postings re Hickey (in say 3 threads)(search hickey).
The critical thing is whether an accidental burst could clear the windshield -- & my drawings show that the AR15 had to be 3" higher (based on the cars etc being on level ground) -- or praps only 1" higher if Queen Mary dipped due to braking (which of course it did brake)(which is why Hickey fell forward).
When i say praps only 1" higher i really mean that it still has to be 3" higher, but the dipping due to braking would in effect raise the AR15 from being 1" higher to being 3" higher, u know what i mean.
Donahue's drawing was never meant to show whether the AR15 could shoot over the windshield -- the drawing merely meant to show that the angle of the head wound suited the AR15, & didnt suite the Carcano.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2021, 12:58:37 AM by Marjan Rynkiewicz »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #126 on: September 01, 2021, 01:23:17 AM »
U should read my postings re Hickey (in say 3 threads)(search hickey).
The critical thing is whether an accidental burst could clear the windshield -- & my drawings show that the AR15 had to be 3" higher (based on the cars etc being on level ground) -- or praps only 1" higher if Queen Mary dipped due to braking (which of course it did brake)(which is why Hickey fell forward).
When i say praps only 1" higher i really mean that it still has to be 3" higher, but the dipping due to braking would in effect raise the AR15 from being 1" higher to being 3" higher, u know what i mean.
Donahue's drawing was never meant to show whether the AR15 could shoot over the windshield -- the drawing merely meant to show that the angle of the head wound suited the AR15, & didnt suite the Carcano.


Donahue's drawing was never meant to show whether the AR15 could shoot over the windshield -- the drawing merely meant to show that the angle of the head wound suited the AR15, & didnt suite the Carcano.

Anybody who believes that the carcano was the murder weapon is extremely ignorant about the TSBD carcano.   ( and carcano's in general. )

 

Online Marjan Rynkiewicz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #127 on: September 01, 2021, 01:42:51 AM »

Donahue's drawing was never meant to show whether the AR15 could shoot over the windshield -- the drawing merely meant to show that the angle of the head wound suited the AR15, & didnt suite the Carcano.

Anybody who believes that the carcano was the murder weapon is extremely ignorant about the TSBD carcano.   ( and carcano's in general. )
I dont think there is much of a problem re the carcano, the problem is the bullet, a hollow point kind of bullet blew a large chunk of JFKs head away, and a carcano can fire hollow points, eg Oswald could have dug the nose off an ordinary FMJ hizself.
But re Hickey, a search on this forum for Hickey yields only 2 pages of hits, & i see that some eg may 2019 mention Hickey being the shooter.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #127 on: September 01, 2021, 01:42:51 AM »