3 shooters instead of 1?

[Walt Cakebread]

How would they explain the fact that bullets or bullet fragments fired from rifles other than Oswald's MC rifle were found in the car or body?  And that they struck the body from directions other than from behind?   It is downright silly to suggest that the fantasy conspirators went to such pains to frame Oswald using a specific rifle and firing from a specific location, but then conduct the assassination with different rifles firing from different locations.  It's laughable.

You Know nothing about disintegrating bullets .........

[Jon Banks]

You no nothing about disintegrating bullets .........

Frangible Ammo explodes on impact into tiny fragments like the bullet that struck JFK's skull.

It's totally plausible that second or third shooter would use that type of ammo over the type of ammo that could be ballistically matched to a specific rifle.

What is Frangible Ammo:

Frangible – the characteristic of breaking into tiny fragments – is a bullet that doesn't deform or expand like a hollow point, but instead shatters or disintegrates upon impact with the target. This target is anything harder than the bullet itself, which is usually made of composite materials that are pressed together with adhesives or formed under high pressure into a "solid" bullet shape. Frangible bullets are sometimes known as Advanced Energy Transfer rounds, or AETs, and the Glaser Safety Slug is by far the most recognizable name.
https://ammo.com/bullet-type/frangible

[Richard Smith]

You no nothing about disintegrating bullets .........

Silencers, disintegrating bullets, cloak of invisibility.......  This is getting more outlandish than a James Bond story.   You can't really believe that nonsense.  And all they had to do was use the same rifle that they had taken great pains to link to Oswald and fire from it from the same location that they set up to frame him from.  But instead it is like the shootout at the O.K. Corral. 

[Walt Cakebread]

Frangible Ammo explodes on impact into tiny fragments like the bullet that struck JFK's skull.

It's totally plausible that second or third shooter would use that type of ammo over the type of ammo that could be ballistically matched to a specific rifle.

What is Frangible Ammo:

Frangible – the characteristic of breaking into tiny fragments – is a bullet that doesn't deform or expand like a hollow point, but instead shatters or disintegrates upon impact with the target. This target is anything harder than the bullet itself, which is usually made of composite materials that are pressed together with adhesives or formed under high pressure into a "solid" bullet shape. Frangible bullets are sometimes known as Advanced Energy Transfer rounds, or AETs, and the Glaser Safety Slug is by far the most recognizable name.
https://ammo.com/bullet-type/frangible

Thank You for posting the link, Mr Banks.....

You can find frangible ammo in quite a few varieties, available for both pistols and rifles. However, you’re more likely to find the pistol ammo due to the frangible rifle round's performance inconsistencies from firing at such high velocity – including fragmenting early, jamming in the rifle or other issues.

I've long believed that the round that struck John's head was a 45 caliber ( subsonic ) frangible bullet.....and it was fired from a 45 caliber weapon that was equipped with a silencer.

[Jon Banks]

Silencers, disintegrating bullets, cloak of invisibility.......  This is getting more outlandish than a James Bond story.   You can't really believe that nonsense.  And all they had to do was use the same rifle that they had taken great pains to link to Oswald and fire from it from the same location that they set up to frame him from.  But instead it is like the shootout at the O.K. Corral.

A "Frangible bullet" plausibly explains the behavior of the bullet that broke into fragments in Kennedy's skull. It's not baseless speculation. It's speculation based on the evidence.

I'm unaware of any evidence suggesting that silencers were used.

[Jerry Freeman]

I'm unaware of any evidence suggesting that silencers were used.

What kind of evidence would there be?

[Jerry Freeman]

Silencers, disintegrating bullets, cloak of invisibility.......  This is getting more outlandish than a James Bond story.  You can't really believe that nonsense. And all they had to do was use the same rifle that they had taken great pains to link to Oswald and fire from it from the same location that they set up to frame him from.  But instead it is like the shootout at the O.K. Corral.

The only nonsense around here are your posts.

[Richard Smith]

The only nonsense around here are your posts.

Nice rebuttal.  So full of substantive arguments and logic to advance the discussion.  I point out that if conspirators spent considerable time and effort to connect Oswald to a specific rifle and shooting location, they would assassinate JFK with a different rifle fired from a different shooting location, and you knock it all down with this fantastic post.