Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation  (Read 127320 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1040 on: September 03, 2022, 04:17:54 AM »
Advertisement
Texas attorney Kellye Sorelle has been arrested in January 6th federal criminal case.

Charged with conspiracy & obstruction.

Earlier this year, Sorelle said she was serving as acting head of the Oath Keepers after arrest of Stewart Rhodes.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1040 on: September 03, 2022, 04:17:54 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1041 on: September 03, 2022, 07:35:50 AM »
And another Jan 6 defendant asks a judge for a "change of venue" to move his case out of DC.

Peter Schwartz argues "the potential for that temptation among jurors drawn from this District is simply too great"

These motions have not worked so far.. in Jan 6 cases in DC.


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1042 on: September 03, 2022, 04:30:48 PM »
J6 drops subpoena for RNC’s Salesforce records: report
https://www.rawstory.com/j6-drops-subpoena-for-rncs-salesforce-records-report/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1042 on: September 03, 2022, 04:30:48 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1043 on: September 03, 2022, 10:18:04 PM »
How the January 6 Committee ‘may have the goods’ on Newt Gingrich



Longtime Republican disruptor Newt Gingrich, Senior Advisor to then-President Donald Trump Jared Kushner, and longtime campaign advisor Jason Miller conducted an email discussion about posting ads falsely disputing the results of the 2020 election, according to a letter sent to Gingrich by the U.S. House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack.

"The goal is to arouse the country's anger," Gingrich said in one email, the Committee states in its letter which asks him to testify voluntarily and preserve all related documents.

The Committee says it also has evidence Gingrich was "involved in the fake elector scheme."

Even in the hours after the violent but failed January 6 coup, the Committee says Gingrich "continued to push efforts to overturn the election results," and emailed Mark Meadows at 10:42 PM.

Attorney and Professor of Law Anthony Michael Kreis says it "sounds like the January 6th Committee may have the goods on Newt Gingrich orchestrating part of a broader conspiring to solicit election fraud and/or commit unlawful interference with election administration under Georgia law."

In its letter the Committee writes it "has obtained information indicating that you have knowledge about former President Donald J. Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, and we write to seek your voluntary cooperation. Some of the information that we have obtained includes email messages that you exchanged with senior advisors to President Trump and others, including Jared Kushner and Jason Miller, in which you provided detailed input into television advertisements that repeated and relied upon false claims about fraud in the 2020 election."

"These advertising efforts were not designed to encourage voting for a particular candidate. Instead, these efforts attempted to cast doubt on the outcome of the election after voting had already taken place.," the Committee's letter to Gingrich reads. "They encouraged members of the public to contact their state officials and pressure them to challenge and overturn the results of the election. To that end, these advertisements were intentionally aired in the days leading up to December 14, 2020, the day electors from each state met to cast their votes for president and vice president," the Committee adds.

"Among the numerous emails you exchanged regarding purported election fraud, you wrote on December 8, 2020, urging Donald Trump's campaign to air advertisements promoting the false narrative that election workers had smuggled suitcases containing fake ballots at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. This email shows that you provided line edits to the scripts used to produce television advertisements and suggested that the advertisements include a 'call-to-action' of pressuring state officials. You specifically pushed for national advertisements to include false allegations about what you called the 'suitcase scandal.'"

Read More Here: https://twitter.com/AnthonyMKreis/status/1565473575905132544

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1044 on: September 04, 2022, 05:46:19 AM »
More on Salesforce.

Jan. 6 committee drops subpoena for RNC fundraising data:

The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection is dropping its subpoena of the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the software vendor Salesforce for information related to fundraising emails the party sent ahead of the attack, multiple media outlets reported.

The Washington Post first reported on Friday that counsel for the RNC and Salesforce were notified this week that the committee is withdrawing the subpoena, deeming the information not necessary anymore at this stage of the investigation.

“Given the current stage of its investigation, the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol has determined that it no longer has a need to pursue the specific information requested in the February 23, 2022 subpoena that it issued to Salesforce,” Douglas Letter, the House general counsel, wrote in an email to the RNC and Salesforce, according to the Post.

Salesforce owns the platform that the RNC uses to fundraise.

The House committee subpoenaed Salesforce for information related to RNC fundraising efforts in February, saying the committee and the Trump campaign solicited donations with unfounded claims that the 2020 presidential election was tainted by massive voter fraud. A Jan. 6 committee spokesperson said in March that the committee wanted to investigate the impact of false messages in the weeks leading up to the Capitol attack and where donations were directed.

The RNC filed a lawsuit to quash the subpoena in March, saying that it violated the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and did not “advance a legislative purpose.” A federal judge rejected the lawsuit in May, saying that it did not violate the RNC’s constitutional rights and that the select committee’s interest in obtaining the information outweighed any burden placed on the RNC.

But an appeals court temporarily blocked the committee from obtaining the records later that month while the RNC challenged the subpoena.

The decision comes as the select committee is expected to resume its public hearings on the insurrection later this month following a break.

The select committee and RNC did not immediately return requests from The Hill for comment. A spokesperson for Salesforce declined to comment.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3627004-jan-6-committee-drops-subpoena-for-rnc-fundraising-data-reports/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1044 on: September 04, 2022, 05:46:19 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1045 on: September 04, 2022, 09:31:56 PM »
Day of Rage: How Trump Supporters Took the U.S. Capitol

Watch: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000007606996/capitol-riot-trump-supporters.html

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1046 on: September 05, 2022, 03:14:49 AM »
January 6 committee assumes Mike Pence will testify, Jamie Raskin says

Congressman says of former vice-president, ‘I would assume he is going to come forward and testify voluntarily’

The January 6 committee assumes the former vice-president Mike Pence will testify before it, a panel member said on Sunday.

“I would assume he is going to come forward and testify voluntarily,” Jamie Raskin, a Democratic congressman from Maryland, told CBS’s Face the Nation.

Raskin also said Ginni Thomas, a rightwing activist married to the supreme court justice Clarence Thomas, “has relevant testimony to render [and] should come forward and give it”.

After the 2020 election, Ginni Thomas contacted Republicans in Arizona and Wisconsin, pushing them to overturn Joe Biden’s victories in the key swing states.

Members of the January 6 committee including Liz Cheney, the vice-chair and one of two Republicans on the panel, have said Thomas could face a subpoena. But none has been forthcoming.

Clarence Thomas was the only justice to say Donald Trump should not have to surrender records to the committee as it investigates Trump’s attempt to overturn his 2020 defeat and the deadly attack on Congress it inspired.

It subsequently emerged that Ginni Thomas was in contact with the Trump White House as it attempted to nullify electoral results in key states.

Pence presided over the certification of electoral college results at the Capitol on 6 January 2021, which the mob Trump told to “fight like hell” was attempting to stop.

Pence refused to stop certification, as advisers to Trump claimed he could. Some rioters chanted “Hang Mike Pence” and erected a gallows. The vice-president narrowly escaped contact with some who breached the Capitol.

In testimony to the January 6 committee, Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House staffer, said Trump told senior aides Pence “deserved” such treatment.

Sticking to his lie that Biden’s win was the result of electoral fraud, Trump said this week the 2020 election should be re-run.

Raskin – a professor of constitutional law – told CBS: “Well, first, if he’s saying that the election should be rerun, which is something he’s been saying from the beginning, that’s totally outside of the constitution.

"There is no procedure for the military just to seize the election machinery and run a new election, which is one of the things that [Trump’s] disgraced former national security adviser Michael Flynn was pushing and we know was part of the January 6 plot.

“And look, more than 60 courts rejected every claim of electoral fraud and corruption which Donald Trump advanced. He’s had the benefit of more than 60 courts, including eight courts where he appointed the judges to office, look[ing] at all those claims, and they were all rejected. It was rejected in the states and he lost the election.”

Raskin was also asked about Republican anger over Biden’s primetime address in Philadelphia on Thursday, in which the president warned that Trump and his supporters posed a threat to American democracy.

Raskin said: “Two of the hallmarks of a fascist political party are one, they don’t accept the results of elections that don’t go their way, and two, they embrace political violence.

“And I think that’s why President Biden was right to sound the alarm this week about these continuing attacks on our constitutional order from the outside by Donald Trump and his movement.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/04/mike-pence-ex-vice-president-january-6-panel-jamie-raskin

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1047 on: September 05, 2022, 04:07:59 PM »
Judge has rejected change-of-venue request by Capitol breach defendant Larry Brock, who's accused of carrying zipties amid the mob on Jan 6

Case *remains* in DC

(Jan 6 "change-of-venue" motions are repeatedly failing)


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #1047 on: September 05, 2022, 04:07:59 PM »