3D Modeling

[Jerry Organ]

             The above is exactly why nobody should rely on Armchair Researchers. They routinely "GUESS". The Knott Labs Laser 360 Technology = SCIENCE.  SBT = "IMPOSSIBLE"

More zingers. You think there's no guesswork in the Knott Laboratory study's subjectively-placed elements? Where have you addressed the concerns raised here about the Knott study/

There's a margin-of-error in any trajectory study. Somehow the critics think that LN-produced models and trajectory have to match on the molecular-level. That gives them their "out" to reject anything SBT-related. It's a cult.

[Royell Storing]

More zingers. You think there's no guesswork in the Knott Laboratory study's subjectively-placed elements? Where have you addressed the concerns raised here about the Knott study/

There's a margin-of-error in any trajectory study. Somehow the critics think that LN-produced models and trajectory have to match on the molecular-level. That gives them their "out" to reject anything SBT-related. It's a cult.

          You guys have been so spoiled by having a THEORY rubber stamped as fact for 60 years, that you Now have no regard what-so-ever when SCIENCE reveals the Truth. And SCIENCE determining that the SBT is IMPOSSIBLE, is only the Knott Lab opening act. Plus, RFK Jr is now piling on and naming names. You LN's that NOW refuse to accept the SCIENCE are in for a very long rough ride.

[Jack Nessan]

More zingers. You think there's no guesswork in the Knott Laboratory study's subjectively-placed elements? Where have you addressed the concerns raised here about the Knott study/

There's a margin-of-error in any trajectory study. Somehow the critics think that LN-produced models and trajectory have to match on the molecular-level. That gives them their "out" to reject anything SBT-related. It's a cult.

Maybe give them an attaboy for effort but it looks to be little better than a circus trick. Thomas Canning and old school math is infinitely better. A survey transit and basic trigonometry with explanations of all the assumptions and measurements is easily followed and understood. This 3D model looks to be anybody’s guess and in conclusion here is the end result. Nothing more than one more individual trying to prove it is a conspiracy using faulty logic and poor reasoning.

[Chris Davidson]

Thomas Canning and old school math is infinitely better. A survey transit and basic trigonometry with explanations of all the assumptions and measurements is easily followed and understood.

The WC used this method and created the sham.

[Royell Storing]

Maybe give them an attaboy for effort but it looks to be little better than a circus trick. Thomas Canning and old school math is infinitely better. A survey transit and basic trigonometry with explanations of all the assumptions and measurements is easily followed and understood. This 3D model looks to be anybody’s guess and in conclusion here is the end result. Nothing more than one more individual trying to prove it is a conspiracy using faulty logic and poor reasoning.

   "Circus trick"? Really? Knott Labs Laser 360 is routinely used in courtrooms across this entire country. You've obviously been knocked cattywampus by SCIENCE determining that the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". Now, this same SCIENCE is being used to locate other shooting location(s).

[Jack Nessan]

   "Circus trick"? Really? Knott Labs Laser 360 is routinely used in courtrooms across this entire country. You've obviously been knocked cattywampus by SCIENCE determining that the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". Now, this same SCIENCE is being used to locate other shooting location(s).

Thomas Canning had an oval shaped possibility around the window as to the origination of the shot. It was all based on an intricate set of measurements and assumptions. The Circus Trick 3D model appears to originate the shot out of the middle of Canning's oval. They in their infinite wisdom pinpointed something that cannot be pinpointed and then they and you have now labeled it as science.

[Jack Nessan]

The WC used this method and created the sham.

Seems easy enough to understand. Is thge problem that you do not think a jacketed bullet can pass through soft flesh and strike something or someone further down range?.

[Royell Storing]

Seems easy enough to understand. Is thge problem that you do not think a jacketed bullet can pass through soft flesh and strike something or someone further down range?.

   When do you show us the Woody Woodpecker cartoon?