The “government,” at least in the US, has been construed as: of the people, by the people, and for the people. In other words, we (the people) elect the government officials from our midsts. And if they do not serve the people in a good way, they can be voted out of office.
Yes, government officials are people. And people are human and therefore subject to making mistakes and sometimes even being corrupted. We should always question the actions and decisions of those elected officials. And we should try our best to look at all sides of the situations that we learn about through the news media, by whatever source we get the news from, and not just accept what is presented to us as the whole truth. The wholesale condemnation of the government officials as being corrupted (just because they are in power) is not deserved. Sadly, partisan politics and the zealots on either side try their best to portray the other side as evil. And the media loves to try to sell their stories by making them more sensational.
So, to answer your question, I believe that the media and filmmakers, etc. are more to blame (for the decline in trust in the government) than the actual government officials. But in the end analysis, we the people are responsible for making our own attitudes. We need to make the effort to learn the whole truth of the important matters by trying to always look at all viewpoints, not just lazily accept what is shown in the news as the truth. We can and should hold the media and filmmakers just as responsible for presenting the truth to us as we can and should hold the elected officials responsible for doing the right things. Pointing fingers and blaming others for the way things are isn’t going to solve anything. We are responsible for our own thoughts and actions, not someone else. And once we realize that and start making the effort to improve ourselves by learning the whole truth and acting accordingly the decline in trust of the government might just reverse itself. Until then, I have to say that it probably will not….
We’ll have to agree to disagree on the role the Media plays in this.
Granted, I agree that the corporate media is largely to blame for exploiting political partisanship and the painting of the opposition political party as “evil”. Fox News and MSNBC are opposite sides of the same coin. In recent years, exploiting political polarization seems to have become a key part of their business models.
Where I disagree is the idea that the mainstream media and even Hollywood promote anti-government sentiment. That seems quite far from the current reality we live in where Oliver Stone, an award winning film maker, can’t find a US distribution company for his most recent JFK assassination film.
The 1991 JFK movie was trashed for the most part by the news media. In fact the news media has been the biggest and most consistent cheerleader for the Warren Report.
Occasionally the news media covers a bombshell story that makes the government look bad but most of the time, they ignore lots of other stuff involving our government that only gets covered in alternative media or foreign media.
And Hollywood has had a close relationship with the Defense Dept going back to WWII. Despite the occasional film like “Platoon”, which Oliver Stone took ten years to make due to disinterest from Hollywood, they most often paint the US military and intelligence services in a positive light.
So while I agree that the media is a factor in political partisanship, I disagree that they are largely to blame for the persistence of conspiracy theories.
People who distrust the government often also distrust the mainstream media. So I don’t see how the media is to blame.