The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth

[Bill Chapman]

Well, you would know more than anybody about zero! After all it takes one to know one.

There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth
hits of my innovative, to-the-point method of communication

So as you pair of rats scurry off your stinking, sinking ship-of-fools,
I will remind others that my push-back re Freeman concerns his
charge that the images involved score Gigabyte levels of bandwidth usage

Watch this, and keep in mind that you can pull the original image off the forum
page onto your desktop and get the image size using your own 'Get info' app.

Here: Pull this off the forum page and yank it to your desktop

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Tracy: Aren't these documents the same ones that were found and reviewed by the AARB ARRB and then withheld on national security concerns? These are the ones that Judge Tunheim said he saw and that, in his opinion, contained sources and methods and nothing indicating a conspiracy?

Or is this a different batch?

To my knowledge, we are indeed talking about the same documents and they were all reviewed by Tunheim. He saw no smoking guns.

I couldn't agree more with the rest of your comments and the way you have expressed them. Morley can't be taken seriously as a journalist anymore-he is a far left conspiracy activist. I wish everyone would read Nalli's article. The case against Oswald is as ironclad in 2021 as it was in 1964. Perhaps even more so.

Thanks for reading my article.

[Bill Chapman]

This is a research forum? = None, no, nada, ziltch that is--"0"  gainful knowledge from you here.
 So keep posting your silly cartoons, gifs, and bogus youtube clips if you really think you've earned it
I have contributed thoughtful scrutiny here...judge lest you be judged---pitiful one.

Your 'thoughtful scrutiny' has only revealed your ridiculous, adolescent 'asks'. The worst, most useless I've seen on this forum. That, amid six decades of nameless 'conspirators', and shooter(s) not named Oswald. What... too soon?

Now, be a man.. answer your charges and tell us how you came with any GB-sized bandwidth hits. What, too soon?

UPDATED 7:38PM  EST

[Martin Weidmann]

There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth
hits of my innovative, to-the-point method of communication

So as you pair of rats scurry off your stinking, sinking ship-of-fools,
I will remind others that my push-back re Freeman concerns his
charge that the images involved score Gigabyte levels of bandwidth usage

Watch this, and keep in mind that you can pull the original image off the forum
page onto your desktop and get the image size using your own 'Get info' app.

Here: Pull this off the forum page and yank it to your desktop

There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth

That may be, but there is everything zero about you.

And the next time you call forum members "rats", I will demand that admin enforces the rules of the forum.

[Jerry Freeman]

 ...there is everything zero about you. And the next time you call forum members "rats", I will demand that admin enforces the rules of the forum.

You see Bill Chapman....nobody likes you.

[Bill Chapman]

There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth

That may be, but there is everything zero about you.

And the next time you call forum members "rats", I will demand that admin enforces the rules of the forum.

LOL. All of a sudden you're lilly white. 
 
The guy who insults every LN in every post. The guy who, when new rules were announced concerning paying a fine if rules were broken said 'nobody is going to tell me what to say'

You're a real piece of work, Slick..

[Martin Weidmann]

LOL. All of a sudden you're lilly white. 
 
The guy who insults every LN in every post. The guy who, when new rules were announced concerning paying a fine if rules were broken said 'nobody is going to tell me what to say'

You're a real piece of work, Slick..

You're a real piece of work, Slick..

It takes one to know one. But go ahead and try your luck...

[Bill Chapman]

You see Bill Chapman....nobody likes you.

I'm all shook up