Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?

[John Mytton]

Says the guy who quoted one of these articles in its entirety just to add a one line comment at the bottom.

Not the same at all in the case you are alluding to, the repetition was essential to the analysis being performed and by referencing the negative we can draw the correct positive inferences.



JohnM

[Ray Mitcham]

What this shows is a shot from the right of JFK and matter going upward and to the left of JFK.

How can you tell which direction it going to the right or left of JFK, in a 2d photo?

[Joe Elliott]

How can you tell which direction it going to the right or left of JFK, in a 2d photo?

No. At least as I can tell.

But it is obvious that almost all the debris was sent flying forward. Some of it up and forward. Some of it level and forward. Nothing is seen going backwards.

Which means that the droplets of blood and specks of brain matter were carried back by the wind which was blowing backwards at 18 to 23 mph relative to the moving vehicles. Which reached the trailing motorcycle officer?s. It looks like it really is a bad idea to pee into the wind.

[Ray Mitcham]

No. At least as I can tell.

But it is obvious that almost all the debris was sent flying forward. Some of it up and forward. Some of it level and forward. Nothing is seen going backwards.

Which means that the droplets of blood and specks of brain matter were carried back by the wind which was blowing backwards at 18 to 23 mph relative to the moving vehicles. Which reached the trailing motorcycle officer?s. It looks like it really is a bad idea to pee into the wind.

Sorry, Joe, my question was aimed at the poster, Keyvan, not you.

[Jack Trojan]

Not the same at all in the case you are alluding to, the repetition was essential to the analysis being performed and by referencing the negative we can draw the correct positive inferences.

JohnM

Have you taken that photogrammetry course yet that would qualify you to talk about any of this stuff? Obviously not. You should get on that. It would give you some cred. Be warned tho, you might have a change of heart mate, but I doubt it.

ps What are the physical mechanisms that eject skull fragments almost tangential to the force of impact? And why did the bullet inside JFK's head explode when the MB didn't?

[Joe Elliott]

Sorry, Joe, my question was aimed at the poster, Keyvan, not you.

In that case you should send Keyvan a ?PM?, a ?Private Message?. Posting questions on the forum implies anyone can respond.

[Ray Mitcham]

In that case you should send Keyvan a ?PM?, a ?Private Message?. Posting questions on the forum implies anyone can respond.

I was replying to his post and asking him, so everybody on the forum could see his reply. 

[Bill Chapman]

And why did the bullet inside JFK's head explode when the MB didn't?

The twofer didn't hit large bones directly, just flesh. FMJ ammo was designed to remain intact while traversing flesh (as per the Geneva Convention).

The headshot hit the hard bone of the skull nose-first.

-------------------------------------------------------------

A Pressure Cavity Blew Kennedy's Head Apart
Cite: John MacAdams

The simplest assumption about the explosion of Kennedy's head is that an exiting bullet ripped a large defect and the bullet and brain matter exited at the defect. In fact, the process was a bit more complicated. When a bullet hits human tissue, it loses a lot of energy in under a millisecond, and that energy has to go somewhere. In fact, the energy creates a pressure cavily in the tissue ? almost as though a small stick of dynamite had been set off within the body.