At the end of the day these autopsy photos were supposed to be locked away so that none of us could ever see them but I believe it was Groden who for financial gain smuggled them out, so their authenticity must be genuine but is there any way for us to be absolutely certain, yes there is!
Back when the autopsy photos were taken in 1963 right up until the smuggling by Groden there was virtually no way to fake genuine stereoscopic photos, these type of photos exposed slightly horizontally to the left or right of each other mimic human eyes and enable us to recombine and create stereoscopic images but since a lot of people don't have access to the hardware to enable viewing of stereo images these depth mapped morphs which rely on millions of pixels to be precisely the relative same distance from each respective position of the camera are a satisfactory 2D representation, so in a nutshell when recombined every pixel is at the relative same depth and creates perfect rotation.
The only hole on the back of Kennedy's head was the size of a bullet hole.
The injury on the side of the head is a perfect match to the authentic Zapruder film.
JohnM
No CTer is addressing John Mytton?s point.
Were the autopsy photographs faked. Is it even possible to fake them and pass the 3D test.
Questions:
Is there any photography expert who says these photographs could have been faked. Has such a photography expert made the following demonstration:
** Carve a melon to represent a head shot from the front. Or, perhaps, shoot the melon from the front.
** Take two pictures from slightly different angles of the melon, showing the damage.
** Modify the photographs to make it appear the melon was shot from the back.
** Have these two photographs pass the 3-D test.
Question:
Has such a demonstration ever been done, proving photographs can be modified and still pass the 3-D test?
