Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Last Second in Dallas  (Read 17857 times)

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #24 on: December 13, 2021, 08:49:41 PM »
Advertisement
BS...

When Katzenbach wrote;

"The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."


he ruled out any kind of conspiracy.

Or do you think that Oswald could have a conspiracy without any "confederates who are still at large"?

Arguing that the Katzenbach memo didn't intend to shut down conspiracy speculation requires some skilled mental gymnastics.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #24 on: December 13, 2021, 08:49:41 PM »


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5378
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #25 on: December 14, 2021, 01:18:36 AM »
You can't really be that gullible. No one could've possibly known for certain within 48 hours of the assassination that no one else was involved.



Most of the relevant evidence was known within 48 hours.  It all pointed to Oswald just as it does nearly six decades later.  Any reasonable person would conclude from the evidence that Oswald was assassin.  What they didn't want to happen is to be hijacked into WWIII by those who saw a Russians or Cuban conspiracy behind the assassination when there was no credible evidence of such.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #26 on: December 14, 2021, 01:27:16 AM »
Arguing that the Katzenbach memo didn't intend to shut down conspiracy speculation requires some skilled mental gymnastics.

Their intent was to separate the lunatics from the people who could name names.

@Tippit, for instance


billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next





JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #26 on: December 14, 2021, 01:27:16 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #27 on: December 14, 2021, 02:26:11 AM »
Most of the relevant evidence was known within 48 hours.  It all pointed to Oswald just as it does nearly six decades later.  Any reasonable person would conclude from the evidence that Oswald was assassin.  What they didn't want to happen is to be hijacked into WWIII by those who saw a Russians or Cuban conspiracy behind the assassination when there was no credible evidence of such.

In other words; they ruled out a conspiracy from day two after not having investigated any possible conspiracy and thus not finding any evidence of such....

So, you agree that Oswald was determined, in less than two days, to be a lone gun man based on no evidence whatsoever.   Thumb1:

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #28 on: December 14, 2021, 04:04:02 AM »
Most of the relevant evidence was known within 48 hours.  It all pointed to Oswald just as it does nearly six decades later.  Any reasonable person would conclude from the evidence that Oswald was assassin.  What they didn't want to happen is to be hijacked into WWIII by those who saw a Russians or Cuban conspiracy behind the assassination when there was no credible evidence of such.

By your logic, Robert Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson were unreasonable for suspecting that others were involved.

They didn’t even identify Oswald’s palm print on the rifle within 48 hours (I know the Dallas palm print story but the FBI wasn’t aware of it til days later).

Give me a break.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #28 on: December 14, 2021, 04:04:02 AM »


Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #29 on: December 14, 2021, 04:07:26 AM »
In other words; they ruled out a conspiracy from day two after not having investigated any possible conspiracy and thus not finding any evidence of such....

So, you agree that Oswald was determined, in less than two days, to be a lone gun man based on no evidence whatsoever.   Thumb1:

CSI investigations on TV can be solved in an hour. You mean to tell me it doesn’t happen like that in real life?  :D

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #30 on: December 14, 2021, 04:17:37 AM »
CSI investigations on TV can be solved in an hour. You mean to tell me it doesn’t happen like that in real life?  :D

 :D :D  :D

People are way to quick to dismiss evidence when it doesn't fit with their narrative.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5378
Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #31 on: December 14, 2021, 05:46:05 PM »
In other words; they ruled out a conspiracy from day two after not having investigated any possible conspiracy and thus not finding any evidence of such....

So, you agree that Oswald was determined, in less than two days, to be a lone gun man based on no evidence whatsoever.   Thumb1:

All the evidence pointed to Oswald.  Then and now.  He worked in the building from which the shots were fired.  His rifle was found there.  Bullet casings from his rifle were found by the window from which the shots were fired.  He had no credible alibi for the moment at which the shots were fired.  He could not explain the presence of his rifle at the crime scene but instead lied about his ownership of it.  He fled the scene within minutes and murdered a DPD officer in broad daylight in front of numerous witnesses.  He resisted arrest and assaulted another police officer.  He was a known political nut.  But it was a "rush to judgement"?  HA HA HA.  Comedy gold.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Last Second in Dallas
« Reply #31 on: December 14, 2021, 05:46:05 PM »