Always cherry-picking and shoehorning. Don Quixote looking for some obscure farfetched "tie-in" for his Ash Heap Theory. Like when you tried to show the two large metal fragments from the limousine had jackets whose conbined weights would indicate the fragments came from two separate bullets.
I merely raised the question whether it had ever been determined how the total mass of the copper in the two fragments compared to the mass of a single copper jacket. Ken Rahn spent most of his career trying use flawed bullet lead analysis assumptions to prove that they were from the same bullet. It is certainly possible, if not likely, that they are from the same bullet because one piece is from the nose and the other from the butt end. Does anyone know the answer?
You have to show that the FBI placed those shot positions as a three-shot all-related "shooting sequence" (as you purport), or as separate placements (ie: the Z190 "shot" was placed to demonstrate a theorical missed shot, while the other two "shots" were placed for other reasons and at other times).
Why would they have placed the string between the SN and JFK if they were trying to show a missed shot?
It wouldn't surprise me that an ad hoc wooden scale model with bits and pieces would be just the vehicle to mirror you lamebrain Pet Theory.
I think you meant to say "batspombleprofglidnoctobuns crazy, ash heap, lamebrain Pet Theory".