100 days ago, I challenged the LNs to offer up just one witness to substantiate the lie repeated by Baker and Roy Truly about them being together at the base of the backstairs together, 100 days later they still cannot do it. With good reason, they weren't there together despite a hastily contrived script mired in horse manure to the contrary. The problem with officialdom's hastily contrived script is it is just that, a flimsy script, masquerading as evidence.
Before picking up where I left off in the previous post, I want to share yet another piece of contrived evidence beyond the lying rooftop tandem's exploits on that otherwise locked roof; their phantom encounter with the wrongly accused on the 2nd floor; and the bs about Baker seeing Inspector Sawyer while at the same time sequence he and Roy Truly are supposed to be atop that otherwise locked roof from the inside. Liars R' Us.
Remember that often repeated storyline about Texas School Book Employee Gloria Calvery running up from her position down on lower Elm Street, where she took in the presidential parade that fateful afternoon? In late 2017, I discovered that only one woman was actually running during the immediate aftermath of the assassination (sourced in her own words and captured in the same time sequence by the late Jimmy Darnell's film footage that afternoon), her name wasn't Gloria Calvery (but the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure did anything to embellish their framing of the wrongly-accused) Here's the actual truth ---->
''I, Miss Georgia Ruth Hendrix, freely furnish the following
voluntary statement to Eugene F . Petrakio and A . Raymond Switzer
who have identified themselves to me as Special Agents of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation . "I recall that just seconds after the car in Thich President John
F . Kennedy was riding passed the position where I was standing, I
heard a shot . At first I thought it was a salute to the President,
but when the second shot was fired and I saw the President fall down
in the car I knew someone was shooting at him . When I heard the third
shot I turned and fled back into the Depository Building and immediately
want to my office on the third floor,
With the above in mind, the lone challenge offered up by the Lns was to cite Ms. Hendrick's age, yet when I'd counter with she's much younger than the ancient Roy Truly, and you guys have no problem with him and Baker making a mad dash up the backstairs bs in spite of his age...they suddenly go into cricket-mode. The problem with officialdumbs often parroted back hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse-manure about any of the so-called "truth' masquerading as evidence to frame the wrongly-accused is it's "evidence" cannot ever stand alone all on its own like the plain simple Truth. their "truth" never fails to need a modification here, a modification there, etc. In fact, until this thread challenged the LNs to produce one witness to substantiate Baker and Roy Truly's lie about being together at the base of the backstairs this has become an Oops moment in dire need of modifications they never even anticipated, let alone seen coming, thus their silence. There's a reason for that. They have nothing. They have been rendered speechless amid continuing to cowering away from this challenge with each passing day. The beauty of this particular challenge is they simply cannot offer up one witness to substantiate the lying hastily contrived script's opening scene (Baker and Roy Truly at the base of the backstairs together)
*Will have to return next week the Good Lord willing to share the wrongly-accused's actual movements pre-assassination, during the assassination and post-assassination. The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody. Best wishes to all to remain healthy, safe and free of any lingering COVID-19 variants. The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.
