Questions For Buell Wesley Frazier

[Charles Collins]

Yes, Buell Frazier has a right to his opinion. Of course he does. Everyone does. But what I wonder is this: Is Buell Wesley Frazier's opinion a truly informed opinion? Is Buell even fully aware of all the evidence against Oswald? I wonder. And it's evidence which proves for all time that Lee Harvey Oswald was a double-murderer.

You don't like that? Deal with it!

Frazier's opinion is based on his feelings. He thinks LHO was a nice guy because he was polite and liked playing with kids. The evidence appears to be less persuasive to Frazier than his feelings. Typical of the CT crowd...

[David Von Pein]

The Vincent Scalice bit. The conclusions you draw from it is a complete over exaggeration.

Scalice never handled the rifle itself and was only asked to compare photographs that were claimed to have been of the trigger of the rifle in the National Archives.

Lousy example. I misrepresented nothing here....

"In the early 1990s, fingerprint expert Vincent Scalice, by utilizing different methods of fingerprint photo comparison, was able to find well over a dozen points of identity linking the previously unidentified fingerprints on the trigger housing of the C2766 Carcano rifle to Lee Harvey Oswald's comparison prints. To any reasonable person who evaluates this evidence concerning the fingerprints found near the rifle's trigger, this shows that it's very likely that the last person who touched rifle C2766 prior to its being found on the sixth floor of the Book Depository was Lee Harvey Oswald." -- DVP

Try again, Martin. (You claimed to have numerous examples of my "misrepresentations". Let me see another one.)

[Richard Smith]

Frazier's opinion is based on his feelings. He thinks LHO was a nice guy because he was polite and liked playing with kids. The evidence appears to be less persuasive to Frazier than his feelings. Typical of the CT crowd...

I agree.  Plus he likely would prefer that Oswald is not guilty.  That would mean he would not forever be known in history as the guy who drove the assassin with his rifle to the TSBD.  Frazier is the poster boy for "no good deed goes unpunished."  He did a favor for Oswald and found himself as a potential suspect in the assassination of the President.  He must feel some guilt and anger no matter how undeserved.

[Martin Weidmann]

Lousy example. I misrepresented nothing here....

"In the early 1990s, fingerprint expert Vincent Scalice, by utilizing different methods of fingerprint photo comparison, was able to find well over a dozen points of identity linking the previously unidentified fingerprints on the trigger housing of the C2766 Carcano rifle to Lee Harvey Oswald's comparison prints. To any reasonable person who evaluates this evidence concerning the fingerprints found near the rifle's trigger, this shows that it's very likely that the last person who touched rifle C2766 prior to its being found on the sixth floor of the Book Depository was Lee Harvey Oswald." -- DVP

Try again, Martin. (You claimed to have numerous examples of my "misrepresentations". Let me see another one.)

Only to be dismissed out of hand, one more time? I can find other ways to waste my time.

All you did was copy/paste the crap you have posted on your blog, as if it somehow is the truth. You can't/don't even show that Scalice was actually shown photographs of the MC rifle in the National Archives.

I might give you another example after you have actually answered my questions... so it's up to you.

[Martin Weidmann]

I agree.  Plus he likely would prefer that Oswald is not guilty.  That would mean he would not forever be known in history as the guy who drove the assassin with his rifle to the TSBD.  Frazier is the poster boy for "no good deed goes unpunished."  He did a favor for Oswald and found himself as a potential suspect in the assassination of the President.  He must feel some guilt and anger no matter how undeserved.

You really are one sick puppy. Have you ever met the man?

Or if you haven't, how in the world can you judge him?

[Martin Weidmann]

If he's a Republican, he feels no guilt no matter how deserved.

Dear Richard is an obvious republican 

[Alan Ford]

As has happened on several documents relating to the JFK case, the "3-15-64" date is obviously an error. It should say March 23rd.....as Vincent Bugliosi discusses in the book excerpt seen below.

So, Mr Von Pein, you believe the curtain rods were submitted at 9.45 a.m. on March 23?

[Bill Chapman]

You weren't very good in math class when you were in school, were you Martin? Because you, like most other conspiracy theorists, seem incapable of adding 2 & 2 together.

Maybe, but I know a BS artist when I see one. When you need to start your reply with an insult, you've already lost the argument. You are not an authority on this case, no matter how much information you accumulate. You're just a parrot.

And this statement of yours (which you claim is "factual and correct") can only elicit laughter from anyone who knows just how utterly wrong this statement is: "The MC rifle found at the TSBD can only be tentatively linked to Oswald".

Then prove me wrong! Why don't you?

I have no intention to read the bias diatribes you post on your blog. I have asked you to prove anything I have written is wrong and it seems you can't.

Do you have any evidence that the MC rifle found at the TSBD was ever stored in Ruth Paine's garage?

Do you have any evidence that Buell Frazier and his sister were "mistaken" about the bag Oswald was carrying?

Can you place Oswald on the 6th floor of the TSBD at 12:30 on 11/22/63?

Can you name any of the women on the 4th floor who saw Oswald running down the stairs within 60 seconds of the shots being fired?

And can you prove conclusively that the MC rifle found at the TSBD is linked, beyond tentatively, to Oswald?

Note: I did have a look at the links you've provided and found a number of absolute misrepresentations of the evidence. When you need to misrepresent the evidence only once, you've already lost all credibility.

When you need to start your reply with an insult, you've already lost the argument.
_Like you did in Reply #8



billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next