You think the Klein's documents are manipulated to falsely indicate that Oswald was sent a rifle with a specific serial number, that the BY photos do not depict Oswald holding the rifle left at the TSBD (with that same serial number) as experts have confirmed, that the DPD lied about finding Oswald's palmprint on that rifle, that Marina's WC testimony does not indicate that Oswald kept his rifle in the Paine's garage (despite her saying so in her testimony and directing the DPD to the garage when they ask about Oswald owning a rifle), that there is no accounting for Oswald's rifle except as the one found in the TSBD (he clearly possessed a rifle as shown by the BY photos and confirmed by his wife). Oswald lies about his ownership of ANY rifle. No other rifle is ever associated with him or accounted for in any manner to explain the Klein's documents, photos, and Marina's testimony. It just vanishes into the ether if it is not the one found in the TSBD. Unreal.
Richard "Strawman" Smith strikes again by telling somebody else what [he believes] they think. Hilarious!
You think the Klein's documents are manipulated to falsely indicate that Oswald was sent a rifle with a specific serial number, The Kleins'documents do not indicate anything of the kind.
that the BY photos do not depict Oswald holding the rifle left at the TSBD (with that same serial number) as experts have confirmed, No expert has ever confirmed that the rifle Oswald is holding in the BY photos has the same serial number as the rifle found at the TSBD
that the DPD lied about finding Oswald's palmprint on that rifle, Not the DPD, but Lt Day may well have. The FBI checked the rifle for prints within hours after the assassination and found no prints or even a trace of a print on it.
that Marina's WC testimony does not indicate that Oswald kept his rifle in the Paine's garage The same Marina couldn't identify the MC rifle they found at the TSBD, as being "his rifle", when it was shown to her on Friday evening 11/22/63
that there is no accounting for Oswald's rifle except as the one found in the TSBD Utter BS... Even if Marina did see a rifle wrapped in a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage, that happened in late September 1963. Nobody saw the rifle after that and it could have been removed weeks before the assassination without anyone knowing it. There is not a shred of evidence that the rifle found at the TSBD was ever in Ruth Paine's garage.
(he clearly possessed a rifle as shown by the BY photos and confirmed by his wife)There is no evidence whatsoever that Oswald possessed a rifle in November 1963. The BY photos were taken in March 1963 and they do not show anything more than that he was holding a rifle when the photos were taken.
Oswald lies about his ownership of ANY rifle. Your assumption that he lied isn't evidence of anything. He may well have told the truth.
No other rifle is ever associated with him or accounted for in any manner to explain the Klein's documents, photos, and Marina's testimony. It just vanishes into the ether if it is not the one found in the TSBD. Is there a law that says that if you buy a rifle in March 1963, you can not dispose of it and have to keep it until at least 11/22/63?
It seems that the only way Richard Smith can even present a superficial case is by doing away with just about all the standard rules of evidence, misrepresenting the evidence and jumping to questionable conclusions that are not supported by the evidence.
